Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

In general I am fine with the latest versions of the draft.

However, in draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri I think the mux category needs to be specified for the new SDP attributes.

Now, as I assume the attributes will never be used in a mux scenario, the question is which category shall be used. Suhas/Paul? NOT RECOMMENDED?

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: 09 February 2016 21:50
To: Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

Thanks, Charles.

We’re awaiting sign-off from Christer that his points on both drafts are properly addressed.  Once that happens there are no more open issues.

Two comments:

- We think draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket is ready for WGLC
- We’d appreciate some direction from the chairs on how to move forward the new draft (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri) that was spawned from this effort, which we also believe is ready for WGLC.

Thanks,

Gonzalo



> On Feb 9, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Ram and other draft authors,
> 
> Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-06 ). 
> I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft is now ready for WGLC.
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> On 2/3/16, 12:20 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Charles / WG,
>> 
>> We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket 
>> and also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments 
>> given by Christer
>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/S_MlYOJz-kkE3yLu5IANL9
>> 3ndmM)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ram
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bfcpbis <[e-mail]> on behalf of Cisco Employee 
>> <[e-mail]>
>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM
>> To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro 
>> (gsalguei)" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" 
>> <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" 
>> <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: 
>> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>> 
>>> Hi Charles,
>>> 
>>> I will get back with responses and updated diffs to 
>>> draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till 
>>> this is resolved before looking to start WGLC.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Ram
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <[e-mail]>
>>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am
>>> To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <[e-mail]>, 
>>> "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]"
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, 
>>> Cisco Employee <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:
>>> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>> 
>>>> Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended 
>>>> substantial changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to 
>>>> that.
>>>> 
>>>> Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this 
>>>> response and potential impacts on either/both drafts before 
>>>> starting WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Charles
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro 
>>>> (gsalguei)"
>>>> <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open 
>>>>> comments raised by Christer.  At this point authors feel this is 
>>>>> ready for WGLC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is a pending request for Christer to review the 
>>>>> complementary draft he requested
>>>>> (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original 
>>>>> document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how 
>>>>> best to progress this spin-off draft.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
>>>>>> Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol 
>>>>>> Bis Working Group of the IETF.
>>>>>>         Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the
>>>>>> Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
>>>>>>         Authors         : Victor Pascual
>>>>>>                           Antón Román
>>>>>>                           Stéphane Cazeaux
>>>>>>                           Gonzalo Salgueiro
>>>>>>                           Ram Mohan Ravindranath
>>>>>>                           Sergio Garcia Murillo
>>>>>> Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>>>>> Pages           : 14
>>>>>> Date            : 2015-10-13
>>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>>    The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication 
>>>>>> between
>>>>>>    clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
>>>>>>    protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
>>>>>>    Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
>>>>>>    scenarios.
>>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocke
>>>>>> t/ There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
>>>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websock
>>>>>> et-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the 
>>>>>> time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are 
>>>>>> available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>> 
>>