IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 23 September 2015 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA55F1B32E7; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C1KPwEahjnAp; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB85E1B32EE; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdz138 with SMTP id z138so57620882ykd.2; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NYRLj5Omppqk2hkp669AvP9rXROAHKQ+JLVYVvXe+uI=; b=FYXZxxHIJ3XDWmwtw3uNUj1KrdeRYxITtrS/k30YZwGtQZr/CvfFHeSn3F8+OynHX+ 2kCz2C/AzLmXytDc3WyuaqY4xOYYQA7nUaop0rBFH5aCNYNPGQAWWxBVYge9LDBfzM5H NNigpeiFIoY5PrwrT4BpFS6TDSdOpAV+M5WydzXd5jgH86Crix9rXwysyBdE0W3c9rdW ZlFqFi++IpKARv8qE/Dhgt021vZ9wmSo6lPrhS0cZEhbF0vwItZvV3Mu2bIl/FcwrnLc XryzAZfqBB+wXfgFQAUAZF9bxx+gcZ5Rv8kZB6a2q5dzZira9U79Fz6YjX49tfRrC2dY EkLA==
X-Received: by 10.129.45.194 with SMTP id t185mr29309039ywt.111.1443050731026; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.240.236.79] ([166.177.184.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm6023553ywe.44.2015.09.23.16.25.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <em43c86959-a41f-42e3-a259-e63c4306e867@sydney>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:25:25 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EA88528C-6697-4D5B-BD54-26F6D3361B49@gmail.com>
References: <em43c86959-a41f-42e3-a259-e63c4306e867@sydney>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/Tr56j6neIB6kG_A_MRhPuIQnRfg>
Cc: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:25:33 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 23, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:
> 
> Kathleen,
> 
>>>> In the second sentence on page 42, adding the ending clause may be
>>>> helpful:
>>>>   The size of each of these N messages MUST be
>>>>    smaller than the path MTU to help prevent fragmentation overlap
>>>> attacks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This would be a good addition.  We have other text we need to add re: path
>>> MTU and it is the intent that all messages fit within the path MTU.
>> 
>> Thanks, please let me know when this has been added to the draft and
>> I'll clear.  I see a -14 was posted, but don't see this text and could
>> have missed it.  If so, a pointer would be helpful.
> 
> I have this in a very long list of to-do items, but it's not in the current draft.  I'll also add to that list to notify you when we publish a revision with that text.

Thank you!
> 
> Paul
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email