IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Wed, 23 September 2015 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B91ACE4E; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5wi9mjzO_-f; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224531ACE40; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-098-122-181-215.nc.res.rr.com [98.122.181.215] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t8NLc4Dd006530 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:38:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1443044285; bh=pLHz2okpJXt1RnCb68Vg4gW5GOG7EhNvXv3eOo0A2dM=; h=From:To:Subject:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:Reply-To; b=HlpvCpgjmo80mV6/QKR19DAxqHaoLGYSckYc/hUx+Cc5d6l7yTF3peA5/8x0oMEii PHC3rL5h6RADQ9lQiFvYrfnY0YOlMG2ax/GsvxNpDqnK/DVHvxr09SI85qMh1aoNFn 6+bjKaHWwxixU9U6eUgyPIQcoUdhY76IvB6pLj0o=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:38:07 +0000
Message-Id: <em43c86959-a41f-42e3-a259-e63c4306e867@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH5T-ZPXZSxCr_x8ihtaRrHZJg+EwOgzLBSGDpevU-erFg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.23181.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (dublin.packetizer.com [10.109.150.103]); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/VY8r3BH--ItJ9XvqYQCLQnmJn7k>
Cc: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis.all@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:38:09 -0000

Kathleen,

>>>  In the second sentence on page 42, adding the ending clause may be
>>>  helpful:
>>>    The size of each of these N messages MUST be
>>>     smaller than the path MTU to help prevent fragmentation overlap
>>>  attacks.
>>
>>
>>  This would be a good addition.  We have other text we need to add re: 
>>path
>>  MTU and it is the intent that all messages fit within the path MTU.
>
>Thanks, please let me know when this has been added to the draft and
>I'll clear.  I see a -14 was posted, but don't see this text and could
>have missed it.  If so, a pointer would be helpful.

I have this in a very long list of to-do items, but it's not in the 
current draft.  I'll also add to that list to notify you when we publish 
a revision with that text.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email