IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-26: (with COMMENT)

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533B112F1A2; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4DIjIIRFZqU; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50578120072; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 01:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540455788; x=1541665388; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=WIlT61jhI7wCXoGpC2JSC9jax7bGVighuktRcAkDJQo=; b=aOTpdqPNzD+GQ7MfU92uDTPHlod6b4vcD3FkdY2APPtr4jQKv2yVgrue mu/l8sgZFtNDmHbrRbiFh8idnHtQJtC5SpVuzv8FEk5s0+ajeHT7LXh5u QP/C7tn1RChqreK2MYH+aZjz7y94AbBz4CtiJGIlsr9FPzcjv607bUTTJ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0APAAAVfdFb/4UNJK1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVAEBAQEBAQsBgQ1NKmZ/KAqDa5QwgWgliHyIVYdECwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BhGwCF4J2ITcKDQEDAQECAQECbSiFOgEBAQEDI1YQAgEIEQMBAigDAgICHxE?= =?us-ascii?q?UCQgCBAENBYMhAYEdTAMVpkeBLogFDYIYi2YXggCBEScME4JMglaCSBaCTTG?= =?us-ascii?q?CJgKKXINiFo9kLgkCjVODJhiQO41kiHYCERSBJjMigVVwFWUBgkGCT2sBCI0?= =?us-ascii?q?UbwGLI4EfAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,423,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="474592603"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2018 08:22:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9P8MqLf017143 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:22:52 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:22:51 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:22:51 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
CC: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-26: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUa9d9ODcJ7+BaS0Gq1XNYpo/lbKUvLBIAgAABoICAAFDtAA==
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:22:51 +0000
Message-ID: <395D6700-CC51-4503-8DB5-D2334CBCF7D8@cisco.com>
References: <154041263191.6980.6973412357737569729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD5OKxuS_mVOJ-O_n8N0VBdVCJ+wFioCy58TNzT1KorifhLSDQ@mail.gmail.com> <B74AEAB3-56DC-4D4B-8749-8AFC4D9D65CD@kaloom.com>
In-Reply-To: <B74AEAB3-56DC-4D4B-8749-8AFC4D9D65CD@kaloom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.109.158]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_395D6700CC5145038DB5D2334CBCF7D8ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.29, xch-rcd-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/WlDwoJLtDw9MLKx8TLlvWOYA7FU>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:23:10 -0000

From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 9:33 PM
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>om>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>rg>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>rg>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-26: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com>om>, Keith Drage <drageke@ntlworld.com>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 9:33 PM




On Oct 24, 2018, at 4:27 PM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>> wrote:

Hi Suresh,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:23 PM Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com<mailto:suresh@kaloom.com>> wrote:
Similar to Mirja, I was also wondering why UDP/TLS/BFCP is not called
UDP/DTLS/BFCP instead since it does use DTLS?

The same reason RTP over DTLS over UDP is called UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVP instead of UDP/DTLS/RTP/SAVP -- legacy interop with existing implementations which are already using this proto name.

Thanks for the quick response Roman. That makes sense. Maybe a note to the same effect in the draft would be helpful as well.

[cue] Yes, Roman is exactly right, and great recommendation Suresh.

Cheers,
Charles

Regards
Suresh

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email