[bfcpbis] IETF diff tool and bis drafts
Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com> Tue, 05 June 2012 09:18 UTC
Return-Path: <tomkrist@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC2E21F867A for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Njb+aO7PJDRk for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E9B21F853D for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=tomkrist@cisco.com; l=444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1338887899; x=1340097499; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=OUgk21B1h0CF5TJXg9h6agUgNyUMlkLA3Tu/0CprPy8=; b=Rrp1vsXrg51RLNsMNwGweHQWTjFfDbx48LDyApdanMDwV+JCQ1moSPNo Z4RAKl/F08v+6EY1v9wvDdflce8TrbRO8P50SrK9Pz47R8CJZb8ityyQN gjEKLWFvohSDJsscOb+BVtuaOc5gpGCQJKL9M4Kim+jP0jDwKGboGhBU9 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAEvOzU+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABFtDOBB4IxASVAPRYYAwIBAgFLDQgBAR6HaZYLgSigA5EjA5UbgQ+EQYUugxKBZoJi
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,718,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="5381768"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2012 09:18:18 +0000
Received: from [10.55.90.224] (dhcp-10-55-90-224.cisco.com [10.55.90.224]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q559IIov030244 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:18:18 GMT
Message-ID: <4FCDCEDA.7080502@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:18:18 +0200
From: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: BFCPbis WG <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [bfcpbis] IETF diff tool and bis drafts
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:18:20 -0000
The IETF diff tool http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff works reasonably well for both draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis and draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis when compared with the original RFCs. I have done some white space fixes, especially in the BFCP sequence diagram, to reduce the diff size. I've tried all output formats, they work equally fine. (Although, I personally do like the "Side-by-side diff" and "Html wdiff" best). -- Tom
- [bfcpbis] IETF diff tool and bis drafts Tom Kristensen