[bfcpbis] fragmenting BFCP over UDP
"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 01:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C820B11E8166 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNsfQdncplZ4 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E34811E8165 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yenq4 with SMTP id q4so5752548yen.31 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=RmsBWJK7xzpmT9osx+Dn7xc3rGQ3PzUDLq2QTC8s7XU=; b=NOR00+ouLN0zUGrIkZzJC8t9WdhrrbHQgnooV7I82gxSuswMdveRKXmjp9h56+37RT XMRXh/7SSqfxRiPDPp/8ugHAGMMUfAb0ZjeT5XG3bAhR7VHTus7r7wH/kfF0HW2PI+Wl iCRlXi89IzmMzCJD9MBJVFfLghuv3QC6q+Az0=
Received: by 10.100.130.11 with SMTP id c11mr8856012and.121.1321408060930; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (dhcp-17b3.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.23.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l18sm50960875anb.22.2011.11.15.17.47.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:47:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:45:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4ec3163c.1258640a.3b77.ffffd444@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0082_01CCA412.20B57030"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcykAVp0mOplbyaaTvStNLInUqVYGA==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [bfcpbis] fragmenting BFCP over UDP
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:47:44 -0000
Hi, Another option for the fragmentation may be to send BFCP over UDP as an RTP payload. In this case you can fragment and reassemble using the RTP header seq number and flag. This will also solve the issue of multiplexing with STUN Roni
- [bfcpbis] fragmenting BFCP over UDP Roni Even