Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt

Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tomkrist@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137121F853D for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qw8VEAD7hW4 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EC321F8535 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=tomkrist@cisco.com; l=1401; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346226343; x=1347435943; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ccbsK2GRz/YxsjNhBeAxjoyrFAHxRDvdwZ7Dl4CueGU=; b=Qz5HyuNkHSNGCNZIhU/5kojEwlDm0AG3r74Nn2ikezooMqxyqC9hgwPz 3NHr/KWqqHNYWbmsCl+tBbGvmO4KOVX+9LADTEQrnZqLZRDlByDCCaqS4 0Y6QB8Oj2zP/FupIbIrPEpQMhh2WhsO62nVe+J5pI0cXQ9NuysCaqv46Q k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAN3HPVCQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABFumyBB4IgAQEBBBIBJUARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwYCAQEeh2ubKKBIiwgagyODHAOVVoVciFKBZ4JlgV8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,332,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="76315154"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2012 07:45:38 +0000
Received: from [10.61.100.131] (dhcp-10-61-100-131.cisco.com [10.61.100.131]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7T7jclF015527 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:38 GMT
Message-ID: <503DC8A2.3080003@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:45:38 +0200
From: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
References: <20120829073839.15316.16116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120829073839.15316.16116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:44 -0000

On 08/29/2012 09:38 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>   This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis  Working Group of the IETF.
>
> 	Title           : The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
> 	Author(s)       : Gonzalo Camarillo
>                            Keith Drage
>                            Tom Kristensen
>                            Joerg Ott
>                            Charles Eckel
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 87
> 	Date            : 2012-08-29
>    
[...]

Updated according to agreement in BFCPbis WG session at IETF-84, 
Vancouver, i.e. fixed comments and issues raised by Alfred Heggestad's 
review posted on list 2012-07-16 and the discussion in that e-mail thread:

- Keep SHOULD clear R and F flags for senders (over reliable 
transports). Add "MUST be ignored by receivers". No functional changes.
- Clarify text regarding fragmentation. No functional changes.
- Remove remains of ErrorAck behaviour. Clarify text. No functional changes.
- Clarify and focus text for NAT traversal/keepalive. No functional changes.
     . mention usage of STUN Binding Indication for keepalives
     . point to ICE for how to use it

Should be ready for WGLC - as was the conclusion at IETF-84!

-- Tom