Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Sat, 14 November 2015 04:42 UTC
Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF6B1B3890 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:42:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YC0c1ul3Sf3L for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDAA71B388C for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:42:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5186; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447476148; x=1448685748; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=XFWxgWjhwOW5ISY1L4M6PtWy+sCDVl85sNZNANlzC90=; b=T/JiTwKkjYlQsQFF+8csIT2yaYaAFjdojALU7besCylOgFoqmoSwgP4T PYGOr8fm0RxFwu+SNNBSTIFvYA/7lyKTvhJqBZQtmRXQ0Am5PdHwZR4Wb PHijSB8M+bAG9dFv8HPG95Y5FO9GXYnn/atrWhJrmgQ71aqT19G0YVeIA M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DjAwDyukZW/49dJa1egztTbwaEI7oiAQ2BZBcKhSVKAhyBGzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDQBAQEDAQEBASAROgsMBAIBCBEDAQIBAgImAgICJQsVCAgCBAENBYgmCA2vV5A+AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIEBhVSEfYRxgwSBRAWWSAGFHIgKgVtJg3eWKQEfAQFChARyhDaBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,291,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="208084481"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2015 04:42:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAE4gR0d022117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:42:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:42:26 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:42:26 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBdZWO9iZLlEWGU6Llb7iQs5Gsp5p+f6AgDDU0gCAAQRdgA==
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:42:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D26CBA43.490B0%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20151013164348.9920.89287.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D74D935-2204-49AD-9CDA-D432A74BD477@cisco.com> <D26B6E1C.5EAA1%eckelcu@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D26B6E1C.5EAA1%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.7.151005
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.75.187]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8A39148B4796004A95DEE7C140023351@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/eXnRh0q3KqgcyB47Y9pw_E34oHc>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 04:42:30 -0000
Hi Charles, I will get back with responses and updated diffs to draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till this is resolved before looking to start WGLC. Regards, Ram -----Original Message----- From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt >Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended substantial >changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to that. > >Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this response >and potential impacts on either/both drafts before starting WGLC for >draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket. > > >Cheers, >Charles > >On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" ><bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of gsalguei@cisco.com> wrote: > >>New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open >>comments raised by Christer. At this point authors feel this is ready >>for WGLC. >> >>There is a pending request for Christer to review the complementary draft >>he requested >>(draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original >>document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how best >>to progress this spin-off draft. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Gonzalo >> >>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis >>>Working Group of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the >>>Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) >>> Authors : Victor Pascual >>> Antón Román >>> Stéphane Cazeaux >>> Gonzalo Salgueiro >>> Ram Mohan Ravindranath >>> Sergio Garcia Murillo >>> Filename : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt >>> Pages : 14 >>> Date : 2015-10-13 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication between >>> clients and servers. This document specifies a new WebSocket sub- >>> protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor >>> Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new >>> scenarios. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/ >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> bfcpbis mailing list >>> bfcpbis@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis >> >>_______________________________________________ >>bfcpbis mailing list >>bfcpbis@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis >
- [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-web… internet-drafts
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)