Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <> Tue, 09 February 2016 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747541ACEC3 for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41RYiM_e6vow for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B7D1ACEAF for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=22848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455047017; x=1456256617; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KwtagP09M1ETnRC5ZCDTutEJrVB7QIHGlghKXLV9nuY=; b=cm+PvpUB3Z25y9rkfoiqiF8wFCDLndDcvvewqifs4fVHzNjgS4m5kmJZ uy+T7MzLwiUFcUH7WbfMjguK6OSeLy0TuodMfPsLEOkc4Q3TezQmaAa8M MEPqwJuE/2tQwhIzgBL9PL6q7BmI0X3XrNqfyfZUA6ro9/kPCZ/oEwSX2 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,422,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="71722440"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2016 19:43:31 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u19JhVvW007438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:43:31 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBdZW52xxX/jQ5U+TKdh+0zIhOZ5p+f6AgDBfdwCAAS0sAIB/icyAgAmmyoA=
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:43:30 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2DF8092663D0eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:43:40 -0000

Ram and other draft authors,

Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft ( ).
I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft is now ready for WGLC.


On 2/3/16, 12:20 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <<>> wrote:

Hi Charles / WG,

We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket and
also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments given by


-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis <<>> on behalf of Cisco Employee
Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <<>>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro
(gsalguei)" <<>>, "<>" <<>>,
"<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

Hi Charles,

I will get back with responses and updated diffs to
draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till this
is resolved before looking to start WGLC.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <<>>
Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <<>>,
"<>" <<>>, "<>"
Cc: "<>" <<>>, Cisco
Employee <<>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:

Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended
changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to that.

Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this
and potential impacts on either/both drafts before starting WGLC for


On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro
<<> on behalf of<>> wrote:

New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open
comments raised by Christer.  At this point authors feel this is ready
for WGLC.

There is a pending request for Christer to review the complementary
he requested
(draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original
document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how best
to progress this spin-off draft.



On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM,<> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis
Working Group of the IETF.
        Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the
Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
        Authors         : Victor Pascual
                          Antón Román
                          Stéphane Cazeaux
                          Gonzalo Salgueiro
                          Ram Mohan Ravindranath
                          Sergio Garcia Murillo
Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Pages           : 14
Date            : 2015-10-13
   The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication
   clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
   protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
   Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
There's also a htmlized version available at:
A diff from the previous version is available at:
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
until the htmlized version and diff are available at
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
bfcpbis mailing list<>

bfcpbis mailing list<>

bfcpbis mailing list<>