Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 09 February 2016 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747541ACEC3 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41RYiM_e6vow for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B7D1ACEAF for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=22848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455047017; x=1456256617; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KwtagP09M1ETnRC5ZCDTutEJrVB7QIHGlghKXLV9nuY=; b=cm+PvpUB3Z25y9rkfoiqiF8wFCDLndDcvvewqifs4fVHzNjgS4m5kmJZ uy+T7MzLwiUFcUH7WbfMjguK6OSeLy0TuodMfPsLEOkc4Q3TezQmaAa8M MEPqwJuE/2tQwhIzgBL9PL6q7BmI0X3XrNqfyfZUA6ro9/kPCZ/oEwSX2 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAgBBQbpW/5FdJa1dgm5MUm0GhBaEQLEdAQ2BZhcBC4UgSgIcgRs4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBAEBASBLCwwEAgEIEQMBAigDAgICJQsUCQgCBAENBYgbDrAfjnMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVikmESAoNEYJCgToFkm6ECgGFS4gEgVtKg3mIVY4+AR4BAUKDZGqHV3wBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,422,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="71722440"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2016 19:43:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u19JhVvW007438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:43:31 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBdZW52xxX/jQ5U+TKdh+0zIhOZ5p+f6AgDBfdwCAAS0sAIB/icyAgAmmyoA=
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:43:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D2DF8092.663D0%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <20151013164348.9920.89287.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D74D935-2204-49AD-9CDA-D432A74BD477@cisco.com> <D26B6E1C.5EAA1%eckelcu@cisco.com> <D26CBA43.490B0%rmohanr@cisco.com> <D2D7B752.501D2%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2D7B752.501D2%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.0.151221
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.248.47]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2DF8092663D0eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/e_r-Q5MQI4E7frO4UvcEICFwswU>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:43:40 -0000

Ram and other draft authors,

Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-06 ).
I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft is now ready for WGLC.

Thanks,
Charles

On 2/3/16, 12:20 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi Charles / WG,

We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket and
also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments given by
Christer
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/S_MlYOJz-kkE3yLu5IANL93ndmM)

Regards,
Ram


-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Cisco Employee
<rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>>
Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro
(gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>,
"christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

Hi Charles,

I will get back with responses and updated diffs to
draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till this
is resolved before looking to start WGLC.

Regards,
Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>
Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>,
"bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>"
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>, Cisco
Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended
substantial
changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to that.

Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this
response
and potential impacts on either/both drafts before starting WGLC for
draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket.


Cheers,
Charles

On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro
(gsalguei)"
<bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>> wrote:

New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open
comments raised by Christer.  At this point authors feel this is ready
for WGLC.

There is a pending request for Christer to review the complementary
draft
he requested
(draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original
document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how best
to progress this spin-off draft.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis
Working Group of the IETF.
        Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the
Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
        Authors         : Victor Pascual
                          Antón Román
                          Stéphane Cazeaux
                          Gonzalo Salgueiro
                          Ram Mohan Ravindranath
                          Sergio Garcia Murillo
Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Pages           : 14
Date            : 2015-10-13
Abstract:
   The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication
between
   clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
   protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
   Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
   scenarios.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis


_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis