Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 09 February 2016 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747541ACEC3 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41RYiM_e6vow for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B7D1ACEAF for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=22848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1455047017; x=1456256617; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KwtagP09M1ETnRC5ZCDTutEJrVB7QIHGlghKXLV9nuY=; b=cm+PvpUB3Z25y9rkfoiqiF8wFCDLndDcvvewqifs4fVHzNjgS4m5kmJZ uy+T7MzLwiUFcUH7WbfMjguK6OSeLy0TuodMfPsLEOkc4Q3TezQmaAa8M MEPqwJuE/2tQwhIzgBL9PL6q7BmI0X3XrNqfyfZUA6ro9/kPCZ/oEwSX2 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAgBBQbpW/5FdJa1dgm5MUm0GhBaEQLEdAQ2BZhcBC4UgSgIcgRs4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBAEBASBLCwwEAgEIEQMBAigDAgICJQsUCQgCBAENBYgbDrAfjnMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVikmESAoNEYJCgToFkm6ECgGFS4gEgVtKg3mIVY4+AR4BAUKDZGqHV3wBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,422,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="71722440"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2016 19:43:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u19JhVvW007438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:43:31 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:43:30 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBdZW52xxX/jQ5U+TKdh+0zIhOZ5p+f6AgDBfdwCAAS0sAIB/icyAgAmmyoA=
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:43:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D2DF8092.663D0%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <20151013164348.9920.89287.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D74D935-2204-49AD-9CDA-D432A74BD477@cisco.com> <D26B6E1C.5EAA1%eckelcu@cisco.com> <D26CBA43.490B0%rmohanr@cisco.com> <D2D7B752.501D2%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2D7B752.501D2%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.0.151221
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.248.47]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2DF8092663D0eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/e_r-Q5MQI4E7frO4UvcEICFwswU>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:43:40 -0000
Ram and other draft authors, Thanks for updating and posting the revised draft ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-06 ). I would like to poll the working group to see if people think this draft is now ready for WGLC. Thanks, Charles On 2/3/16, 12:20 AM, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Charles / WG, We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket and also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments given by Christer (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/S_MlYOJz-kkE3yLu5IANL93ndmM) Regards, Ram -----Original Message----- From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt Hi Charles, I will get back with responses and updated diffs to draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till this is resolved before looking to start WGLC. Regards, Ram -----Original Message----- From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>, Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended substantial changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to that. Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this response and potential impacts on either/both drafts before starting WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket. Cheers, Charles On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>> wrote: New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open comments raised by Christer. At this point authors feel this is ready for WGLC. There is a pending request for Christer to review the complementary draft he requested (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how best to progress this spin-off draft. Thanks, Gonzalo On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis Working Group of the IETF. Title : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Authors : Victor Pascual Antón Román Stéphane Cazeaux Gonzalo Salgueiro Ram Mohan Ravindranath Sergio Garcia Murillo Filename : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2015-10-13 Abstract: The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication between clients and servers. This document specifies a new WebSocket sub- protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new scenarios. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ bfcpbis mailing list bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis _______________________________________________ bfcpbis mailing list bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis _______________________________________________ bfcpbis mailing list bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
- [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-web… internet-drafts
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)