Re: [bfcpbis] transaction issue

Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tomkrist@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F2521F84B3 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSf7hJ0lEPHJ for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90F221F84B2 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=tomkrist@cisco.com; l=901; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1340373714; x=1341583314; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PbTS9mYCU4QNXS0kBQL8SvxthS2RtrruL3pPKMxzDWM=; b=IPFEQGu+5Fuia6M/mch7v4oWQWwe7+o99JWUHTsavYAC2eSTM6k4jSUE R/pegXAhVxP2mYodKAKbJ8ip63joFmyPE+DT5gfo4Ms1m4SRwgd5Dg3jd UZ93hwIdKSnmSOflwcxd1Xd3Y1lMtenAMQUv/U8NpixyvEa2iMBZP/beE s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQJAN555E+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABFshuCFwQEgSqBB4IYAQEBBBIBJTAQARALDgoJFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBHodpmhCgEYsuhgIDlSyFVoNYAYRsgWaCYQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,458,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="6114187"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2012 14:01:53 +0000
Received: from [10.55.95.75] (dhcp-10-55-95-75.cisco.com [10.55.95.75]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5ME1q8j022957; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:01:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4FE47AD0.5090603@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:01:52 +0200
From: Tom Kristensen <tomkrist@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Woo Johnman <wuym2000cn@gmail.com>
References: <CAMxBvpCckVJmRQdatTXgmqKOfW=Ev_G2Knp0=yqLFJcw57-xtA@mail.gmail.com> <4FCCB307.40001@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FCCB307.40001@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org, 'Tom Kristensen' <2mkristensen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] transaction issue
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:01:54 -0000

On 06/04/2012 03:07 PM, Tom Kristensen wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 11:59 AM, Woo Johnman wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The RFC4582bis says:"As described in previous paragraph every entity -
>> client or server - is only allowed to send one request at a time, and
>> await the acknowledging response."
>> I think the condition of only one pending request at a time is too hard.
>> Is it more suitable that there is one pending request at a time per
>> conference
>> or ever per connection(client-server)?
> Woo,
>
> Thanks for the comment. I have to read the text chunks related to this
> once more and rethink this approach; I'll be back!

So, I have always assumed the restrictions to send one request at a 
time, applied per connection/association between one client-server pair.

I'm ready to change and clarify the draft text to express just that. Any 
protests/other views out there?

-- Tom