Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B801130E84; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:30:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjkzKMOfXUAx; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18314130E7D; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.45] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBKGTwpR057725 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:29:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1545323400; bh=JnHt+xIhTE/bYMI5LK15K6PmYl7xbq58IXtDjDSYMrI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=N2WQ4VD6CyEiLB78VYF5FOnxQ/IcK5WyiC8vjUf/3COuiv7dbsEvWbPlQcUa5oi2V RauqpYEwniu7EnW2jliTk1uCnf3w5kesBcl7WFFM59NXTUfk/db1MjT+it/Opk7I2V l7gwDDt9V/d2ySbon+HUHmF9Tu5WeF5oysgqFG4E=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.45]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <ACBC2495-CC1E-4E18-A5C2-E903046DC8B8@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BCD7E78D-BA19-40D2-8D92-37564AA681A9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:29:57 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1545292112884.78038@cisco.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com" <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>
To: "Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)" <snandaku@cisco.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <BD283DB2-0DBF-448D-AE5D-F7D517DB79D1@cisco.com> <2FFDC87D-5026-4C28-B256-131E3CDA7FC2@nostrum.com> <9DE98D9F-9896-4E32-BA14-5281D10309A2@ericsson.com> <1545292112884.78038@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/i-9RBvAe05Q_1eGNFi-jXXZl3fE>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:30:13 -0000
I suggest a new version, so we can get things in order before the editing process starts. Adam, do you concur? Ben. > On Dec 20, 2018, at 1:48 AM, Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) <snandaku@cisco.com> wrote: > > Sorry I wasn't aware that I had an action item here. Is the idea to move these attributes to TBD instead of NORMAL ? If so, should we do it as part of Rfc-Editor work or should I submit a new version of mux-attributes that does the changes . > > Please advise > > Thanks > Suhas > From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 11:35 PM > To: Ben Campbell; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) > Cc: Adam Roach; mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com; bfcpbis@ietf.org; The IESG; draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 > > Hi, > > My understanding is that Suhas was going to update the mux-categories draft, to be aligned with 4583bis. > > Regards, > > Christer > > From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> > Date: Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 5.53 > To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com> > Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "adam@nostrum.com" <adam@nostrum.com>, "mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com" <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 > > I’ve probably lost track of the discussion somewhere; but it looks like 4583bis and mux-attributes still disagree on the mux-categories for confid, userid, and floorid. Was there a plan to change those in mux-attributes prior to publication? > > Thanks, > > Ben. > > > On Dec 18, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com <mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>> wrote: > > Ben, > > Please have a look at this updated version and let us know if it addresses your DISCUSS. > Reviews by others and confirmation that this update addresses your comments would be appreciated as well. > > Thanks, > Charles > > From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com <mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>> > Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 8:00 AM > To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 > > Thanks Christer. Here are the links to the corresponding draft. All the changes in it look good to me. > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt > has been successfully submitted by Christer Holmberg and posted to the > IETF repository. > > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt> > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/> > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27> > Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis> > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27> > > Cheers, > Charles > > From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com <mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> > Date: Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM > To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com <mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com <mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis@ietf.org>> > Subject: Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 > > Hi, > > Based on the gen-art review, and the IESG reviews, I have submitted a new version (-27) of draft-rfc4583bis. > > The new version implements the following merged pull request: > > https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/13 <https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/13> > > Thank You to everyone who provided comments! > > Regards, > > Christer >
- [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Ben Campbell
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Ben Campbell
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Adam Roach
- Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27 Ben Campbell