[bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS
Woo Johnman <wuym2000cn@gmail.com> Wed, 30 May 2012 09:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wuym2000cn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3021F866C for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.237
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.237 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.762, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyVwWCCH+xdr for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9775E21F8669 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsq13 with SMTP id q13so2984297qcs.31 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=X6BdrcaPrr3Og30so0IOvq02LDltZ4J/3FY/QcJI4Bs=; b=sU4edQ+hAbwRoZG1I9SSKzdAeOSKgj+7dBBfv8CkmKnEUzIHRHgKiO2lI7Odv4jvTz 7QRd8TMIAgCqlExZy1YJQ3z1FaXAuSlLr+VK4N6U9wlbfIImnvau6m9XX/ADgpOYXGHx kWigPVL7M0otPsHk2UGfU/ZdnSZal5jOMATYc5crZnGoO6Nq1rMJjuFSmL9sxkO6qEBJ FFW7WbR6Td2Qk3gJjL3dFEw6xX2tbWYwPWqB+zAdk+W+tdcQoH4o0f5rcsygcYU9+CtT DM7BYJSmXoJg6c0odRcmkcUFQy/a0eXvHYhoWayyNXVx2X6P5sU+8DESPEHCOKSZnu5q 1TqQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.203.7 with SMTP id fg7mr15272089qab.48.1338370503995; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.239.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:35:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMxBvpB0pnr4Rr31m=mrypiXBJxZjk2bCvroguWAvXxzPRKjiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Woo Johnman <wuym2000cn@gmail.com>
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:35:05 -0000
Hi, I feel BFCP over DTLS is not well documented in rfc4582bis. At section 7 "Lower-Layer Security". It says "BFCP floor control servers and clients MUST support TLS for transport over TCP and MUST support DTLS for transport over UDP [4]." But reference [4] is only about BFCP over TLS. Reference for BFCP over DTLS seems missing. At the end of the same section,it seems say DTLS connection setup procedure shall follow [7]. If it is true, does it mean BFCP message is packeted as SRTP? If not, would it be better to give more details about DTLS connection setup and packetization. Please give more explain. Thanks in advance, Youngmin
- [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Woo Johnman
- Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Alan Ford
- Re: [bfcpbis] BFCP over DTLS Tom Kristensen