Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

Christer Holmberg <> Tue, 13 October 2015 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096181A88AF for <>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvFe6udEgp7f for <>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435941A889A for <>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 02:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79136d0000071e2-95-561cd561a03f
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AC.38.29154.165DC165; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:56:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:56:49 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
Thread-Index: AQHQ24v2XEqd0jP1zEWw4qlKCxlsg54VzSoAgFLK2gCAAAk9AIAA4oTA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:56:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7iVZkwgy0LrSymn/nLaPFv3VEm i02zvrBZzJ3iZ7G8awejA6vHlN8bWT2+PHnJ5LFkyU+mAOYoLpuU1JzMstQifbsErozpy6ew F8zjqVi50LyB8Qt3FyMnh4SAicTlKeuZIGwxiQv31rOB2EICRxklHi6S6WLkArKXMEpM/XmL vYuRg4NNwEKi+582SI2IQIZEY+cfdpAaZoFGRonrW/4wgiSEBVwlWjZMYYYocpN4c/42I4y9 fepzFhCbRUBVYueVjWA2r4CvxIw5t1gglu1klPh1bw07SIJTwFbi+36I6xiBrvt+ag2YzSwg LnHryXyoqwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyPFeRQCQEliWlb00BMZgFNifW79CE6FSWmdD9kh1grKHFy 5hOWCYxis5AMnYXQMQtJxywkHQsYWVYxihanFhfnphsZ6aUWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxiBMbXwS2/ rXYwHnzueIhRgINRiYd3QapMmBBrYllxZe4hRmkOFiVx3mamB6FCAumJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5 qcWHGJk4OKUaGHttp2Rc/6MRNPM3c/k/fvFrC9qcRKP+7bq+OPXIZDX3sq1+DntT+7zz7C1v v/nAUtr458Kla+Kbr37pXsUrYNzLKWsp7SbaxXBmfcNb9RezXS4ob5ebcj54nwHzPodPH1hm zs1O2zHt053udZuNuLZX3N1tNXnSglXHxZdMmydXd+bzVR9fQ0UlluKMREMt5qLiRADQd2x4 kAIAAA==
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "Ram Mohan R \(rmohanr\)" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:56:54 -0000


I am sorry that I didn't reply earlier.

Based on the diff, the changes look fine.



-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) [] 
Sent: 13. lokakuuta 2015 1:26
To: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
Cc: Christer Holmberg;;; Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

Hi Charles - 

We have sent the latest version of BFCPoWS draft (draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05) and diffs addressing Christer’s comments.  We are awaiting his confirmation that these changes look ok.  Once that is done we are ready to publish the drafts.  I’ve attached the draft and diffs here again, in case they are needed.  This includes a request to review the complementary draft he requested (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original document.

As far as the authors are concerned there are currently no open issues.  Not sure a discussion of these drafts is necessary, but we are happy to discuss them in any capacity the WG deems necessary.