IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-06.txt

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Fri, 12 October 2012 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBF121F84D8 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQdown2ar4iY for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE49C21F8491 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2098; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1350082493; x=1351292093; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=RJsR1C9p5bEy5I0A7WP/dS29EMKROftUGlug0ndZHCo=; b=Eg1nbELDlsNROquLfHdR23sVo8M2C7EX90/xpmG+bAwCIjis2IR2nDL6 +fqpKUwKf499Xwn5X+QydDH5h2Ra0QzMrxm2FHR7xJUMrsycI4qWvhh3k s9jFNnUGDLEa8XxS4/BcpOfWH6NNfPjOBEvdnbZyPiXokLXb8b1RZ7DjU 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EANOeeFCtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABFv22BCIIgAQEBBAEBAQ8BJzQXBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQBEggah2EBC5szn3qLUoVdYAOXAo0wgWuCbYFcIxg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,578,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="131136004"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2012 22:54:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9CMsrX8032221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:54:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.25]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([173.37.183.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:54:53 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)" <tomkrist@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNqHBT/Moj/2Z7+E+25CL3XKCrZ5e15S+AgABiH4A=
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:54:52 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C088280E3FA1@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
References: <20121012115421.26326.75189.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50780647.6070003@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50780647.6070003@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.20.26]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19266.000
x-tm-as-result: No--48.716800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:54:54 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thanks for the quick turnaround on this. I have reviewed the updated draft and validated that all of my comments were addressed, except for this very minor nit:

5) Section 6.2,
r/Entities MUST only have at most one/Entities MUST have at most one

I am okay not addressing this; however, if you need to make changes for any other reason, it would be good to address this one as well.

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:00 AM
> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-06.txt
> 
> On 10/12/2012 01:54 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >   This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis  Working
> Group of the IETF.
> >
> > 	Title           : The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
> > 	Author(s)       : Gonzalo Camarillo
> >                            Keith Drage
> >                            Tom Kristensen
> >                            Joerg Ott
> >                            Charles Eckel
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-06.txt
> > 	Pages           : 87
> > 	Date            : 2012-10-12
> >
> 
> Updated after receiving WGLC review comments from Mary Barnes, Charles
> Eckel and Ernst Horvath, according to discussion and description on the
> BFCPbis WG mailing list.
> 
> In addition, and after checking out with the original authors of RFC
> 4582, the ipr parameter is changed s/pre5378Trust200902/trust200902/.
> 
> Cf. <URL:
> http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-
> rfc4582bis-05.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-
> 06.txt
>  >
> 
> -- Tom
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email