Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Mon, 12 October 2015 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3745B1A1A64 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GH3lqmgV3hia for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97AEC1A1B44 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11811; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444686777; x=1445896377; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xEvB1jvBkBEpC6HiHxzfUKsW/SFdri+zcwK7IwRYGK8=; b=gWEWAsXcavlUNYBOB//ebBOMD/ZywUwUllyMoMprs/PiZ1oiyGXU0h0n QQP2RgVX289K1i3zLk7m95kKTMH5ac9aDoaA0bvjij0S3q82NEFtSvpj5 YIyAiWo4A7qPyFxrB1VZD43xMLjow4DMSrU3KgGywZTpY1JzOJW2ARn+p M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CjAgAUKxxW/40NJK1dgllNVF8PBr19AQ2BWhcBCYJyggo1SgKBODgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCYBAQEEAQEBawsQAgEIEQMBAigHJwsUCQgCBA4FiC4Nv3sBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIprgQaEfA0EB4QuBYc4hg93h1UBhRiIAYFYkWOEWYNuAR8BAUKEAnGFa4EGAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.17,675,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="35022061"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2015 21:52:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CLqtXB025757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:52:56 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:52:43 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:52:42 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
Thread-Index: AQHQ24v2XEqd0jP1zEWw4qlKCxlsg54WQoMAgFJVjoA=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:52:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D2417899.5B462%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <D1FB8E67.55AD7%eckelcu@cisco.com> <676DBA71-E49F-4D86-B82E-8263D70B6C35@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <676DBA71-E49F-4D86-B82E-8263D70B6C35@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.79.227]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D24178995B462eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/lU5nos2k3VUq8Jsb_7NRwxUg9Rk>
Cc: "Ram Mohan R \(rmohanr\)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:53:01 -0000

Any update on this?
I have requested and been assigned a slot for bfcpbis on Monday of IETF 95. Would it be helpful so have some time to discuss these drafts?
As both drafts have expired, I think it is best to publish updates to both drafts, request comments, and schedule time to discuss on Monday if necessary.

Cheers,
Charles

From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 10:33 PM
To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>, "alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>" <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>>, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com<mailto:rmohanr@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

@Charles - Ram and I are working on the updated version and hope to publish it very soon. One additional request below.

@Christer - It would be helpful to get your review of the complementary draft you requested (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00>)0>). That way we can update both at the same time. Let us know if this is something forthcoming.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


On Aug 20, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>> wrote:

Christer,

Thanks for the review and comments.

Draft authors, when can we expect responses to Christer's comments, and/or a corresponding update to the draft?

Cheers,
Charles

From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 11:12 AM
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>" <bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>>
Cc: "alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>" <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>>
Subject: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

Hi,

Below is my review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04.

In general, things look good, and my comments should be mostly editorial. Also, my previous comments on the draft have been addressed. Thanks forthat!

Q1: There are a few abbreviations (TLS, HTTP etc) that are not expanded on first occurrence. I didn't check whether they are considered well knowndouble check.

Q2: I think the last paragraph of section 1, talking about not preventing other mechanisms, can be removed completely.

(I think I previously had the same comment on the draft - or maybe it was another WebSocket sub-protocol draft)

Q3: Section one says "since WebSocket is a reliable transport". Perhaps "provides a reliable transport" would be better?

Q4: Section 5 says "WebSocket [RFC6455] is a reliable protocol". I don't know what "reliable protocol" means, but I assume this text should also talkabout providing reliable transport.

Q5: In section 6.1, there should be a reference for the 'setup' attribute. Also, when talking about SDP attributes, I'd suggest to explicitly say"SDP setup attribute", or something similar.

Q6: The introduction says that the draft updates rfc4582bis and rfc4583bis. I think it would be good to have two explicit "Updates to RFCXXXX" sectionsto list exactly what those updates are.

Q7: Just to check: are the new SDP m- line proto values aligned with the naming approach that has taken place in MMUSIC?

Regards,

Christer





_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis