Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Wed, 03 February 2016 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E651B33BC for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:20:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Prv-tFrXhYWd for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538741B3385 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:20:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6648; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454487645; x=1455697245; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=PDmh8XHLCLvbd1hoDDnHfoDKhjaIG/8Xi0R1Bz56CXY=; b=l0EFUy/qRHajKbq7SPSz0g9Vk1bPFH6WNK7PqbSCr8zl+5tvrs5lTckA tEFodvOPTWbp/wX6bAGC66P8VXxMJTctgdBgOsED8bxhci8p3aiNjPCx8 ou3UDU1CgmYHIDf7lxnV56d33qALxjqK6rWvxbFtTdguO8XKEcI8rAqaX Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BtAgAjuLFW/4ENJK1egzpSbQaEKYQss?= =?us-ascii?q?VMBDYFkFwyFIEoCHIEeOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQQEBAQQBAQEgEToLDAQCAQgRAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQICJgICAiULFQgIAgQBDQWIGw6wSo8PAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF?= =?us-ascii?q?XuFFYQ2hDAYgmqBOgWWcQGFSIgEgVtKg3iIVI4/AR4BAUKDZGqIbwF7AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,389,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="67494394"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Feb 2016 08:20:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u138Kcb9002766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:20:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:20:37 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 03:20:37 -0500
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRBdZWO9iZLlEWGU6Llb7iQs5Gsp5p+f6AgDDU0gCAAQRdgIB/isuA
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:20:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D2D7B752.501D2%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20151013164348.9920.89287.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6D74D935-2204-49AD-9CDA-D432A74BD477@cisco.com> <D26B6E1C.5EAA1%eckelcu@cisco.com> <D26CBA43.490B0%rmohanr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D26CBA43.490B0%rmohanr@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.0.151221
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [173.39.64.86]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5D33491508D4C74A990B0873E6E3C438@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/pGn3paLTxgvbzW3_28Nf4nM6PCk>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 08:20:52 -0000

Hi Charles / WG,

We have published a new revision of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket and
also draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri which addresses the comments given by
Christer 
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/S_MlYOJz-kkE3yLu5IANL93ndmM)

Regards,
Ram


-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Cisco Employee
<rmohanr@cisco.com>
Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 at 10:12 AM
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>om>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro
(gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>om>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>rg>,
"christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt

>Hi Charles,
>
>I will get back with responses and updated diffs to
>draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri soon. I agree that we should wait till this
>is resolved before looking to start WGLC.
>
>Regards,
>Ram
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
>Date: Saturday, 14 November 2015 12:14 am
>To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>om>,
>"bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>rg>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com"
><christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
>Cc: "bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>rg>, Cisco
>Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>
>Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action:
>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>
>>Christer reviewed draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri and recommended
>>substantial
>>changes to it. The authors have not yet responded to that.
>>
>>Regarding draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket, I¹d like to see this
>>response
>>and potential impacts on either/both drafts before starting WGLC for
>>draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket.
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Charles
>>
>>On 10/13/15, 10:02 AM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Gonzalo Salgueiro
>>(gsalguei)"
>><bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of gsalguei@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>>New version of the draft has been published and addresses all open
>>>comments raised by Christer.  At this point authors feel this is ready
>>>for WGLC.
>>>
>>>There is a pending request for Christer to review the complementary
>>>draft
>>>he requested
>>>(draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original
>>>document. Once this is done, we ask the chairs for guidance on how best
>>>to progress this spin-off draft.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Gonzalo
>>>
>>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 12:43 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>>directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis
>>>>Working Group of the IETF.
>>>> 
>>>>        Title           : The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the
>>>>Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)
>>>>        Authors         : Victor Pascual
>>>>                          Antón Román
>>>>                          Stéphane Cazeaux
>>>>                          Gonzalo Salgueiro
>>>>                          Ram Mohan Ravindranath
>>>>                          Sergio Garcia Murillo
>>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt
>>>> 	Pages           : 14
>>>> 	Date            : 2015-10-13
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>   The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication
>>>>between
>>>>   clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
>>>>   protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
>>>>   Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
>>>>   scenarios.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket/
>>>> 
>>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
>>>> 
>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>>submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>> 
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>bfcpbis mailing list
>>>bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>bfcpbis mailing list
>bfcpbis@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis