Re: [bfcpbis] UDP Only

This part of text apparently talks only about use, not support.

Reinterpreting what it says the other way round, it says you should use TCP in all cases where it works, and UDP only where you have problems.

(as another individual)

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Sent: 26 February 2013 20:37
> To: Mary Barnes; Alan Johnston
> Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] UDP Only
> 
> As an individual, my take on this is the same as Mary's. Section 6 of
> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-08 specifies both TCP and UDP as available
> transport protocols, and it says either may be used depending on the
> environment.
> 
> Cheers,
> Charles
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Mary Barnes
> > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:56 AM
> > To: Alan Johnston
> > Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] UDP Only
> >
> > Since no one else has responded, my understanding is that one could be
> > considered compliant if they support UDP only.
> >
> > Mary.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Alan Johnston
> > <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here is a question that came up here at SIPit where we have been
> testing
> > > BFCP over UDP and TCP.
> > >
> > > Can an implementation only support BFCP over UDP and still be
> > compliant?  Or
> > > do endpoints need to support both UDP and TCP?
> > >
> > > - Alan -
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > bfcpbis mailing list
> > > bfcpbis@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bfcpbis mailing list
> > bfcpbis@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis