IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321C4131945 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59oCK0t5A6BW for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED61131798 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2834; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1500279037; x=1501488637; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oIG/5UA9uhEOai1Rl8EMWQmXIiHKp5RID5FcAx8Va0g=; b=NlKUOstDlthCy0d50/TFqkNFKO7UZhtTE5wybT5g2H+fEedY0JHk7M11 EPhyws2VcOK0L9mfKq2YC0W7srauVVbaeDt8s3tjksMrgw7mnQP2YSpNG BO8NZoAXCVrnESn3OnskaAsvT6+ogpEOXc7YwNj9OVLsxyRauc0D11d2N M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AAAQB/cGxZ/4UNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1pkgRQHjgSRPSKWBIIRIQuETE8CGoNePxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrHQuFGAEBAQEDAQEbBhE6CwwGAQgRAwECAwImAgQlCxUICgQOBYovEK5cgiaLEwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4IdhS4rC4Juh30wgjEFnzQCh0iMTIIMV4R4ilSVVgEfOIEKdRVJEgGHA3aHf4ENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,374,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="274493648"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Jul 2017 08:10:36 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6H8AavD016833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:10:36 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 03:10:35 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 03:10:35 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
CC: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Roman Shpount <rshpount@turbobridge.com>, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>, "Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)" <tomkrist@cisco.com>, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
Thread-Index: AQHS/tQqacZkSf+3+0+Qd13paCNRhw==
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:10:35 +0000
Message-ID: <33AC90F8-1963-4F79-ACB2-0DB2873D5E34@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.22.0.170515
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.101.212]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <25B906FDD5054345898B30CAC2CDB942@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/qbaulYW7tYX1p3G0HIc1HNqiSjQ>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:10:39 -0000

(As WG co-chair)

This is a reminder that WGLC ends tomorrow. I realize the time to review overlaps with IETF prep and meeting times. If you require more time to review the draft, please let me know. Otherwise, please share your review comments by the end of tomorrow.

Thanks,
Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 5:59 PM
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Subject: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis

    (As WG co-chair)
    
    This is to announce an additional working group last call for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis, "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams".
    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/
    
    This is intended as a Standards Track RFC, obsoleting RFC 4583.
    Please respond to the list by July 18th (i.e. 2 weeks) with any comments.
    
    We had a working group last call previous, but a significant amount of time and some substantial changes and additions have occurred to justify another review of the draft in its entirely. It is helpful to attempt to categorize your comment (e.g. technical issue vs. editorial), and also to provide any replacement text you feel is necessary.
    If you review the document and have no comments, please tell the chairs that you have reviewed it. This is always useful information in assessing the degree of WG review and consensus behind the document.
    Note, we have not scheduled a working group session for IETF 99 in Prague. This WGLC will close during IETF 99. If helpful, we can arrange a side meeting to discuss any significant issues, or with any luck, gather at a bar to celebrate the draft being ready to advance to the next step toward RFC.
    
    Cheers,
    Charles
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    bfcpbis mailing list
    bfcpbis@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email