[bfcpbis] draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 23 July 2014 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39171A0394 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yaTVEvwRQ-3K for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC80A1B29A2 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com []) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s6NM1Mp3006665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:01:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com []) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s6NM1L7O018901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:01:21 +0200
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:01:21 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01
Thread-Index: Ac+mwaFt+wxUSKuiQLm5dOFQmtDeVg==
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:01:20 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B20F42E@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/rEmeHlrUbkMuCpyGtqq9-X2Qpu4
Subject: [bfcpbis] draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-01
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:01:35 -0000

This has recently been posted.

Prior to WGLC we would like to get some reviews.

I believe at the last meeting Christer Holmberg agreed to do a review.

Additionally Charles Eckel has also volunteered to review it.

We could do with a couple more volunteers. So please step up.

What we are looking for primarily is to ensure that the document has coverage of all aspects that it should cover, and that there are no open issues where we need further technical discussion; if there are, we need to initiate that technical discussion.

Any comments at this point are of course welcome outside this scope.

Ideally we are looking to complete these reviews and any discussion within the next month or so, and then run into WGLC.