IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 05 November 2015 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9B41B35EC for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:32:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhmBl-7SdkHi for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990A51B35EB for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A682092B for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:32:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:32:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=GIpZoDwxgeD9y9k6h2IXegRUaWs=; b=oAISDJ lQWm9Zpx4XemIXfoHFX1C8WRx8Pw527+qy3olZ9A0I2y75rt2j3zuakpvO6LHjB8 3/9aVlT8EjKY/yii/0jf7PIskqfuko+Afg/RoFkz30/FuqrJD6GDPCJqgFYyPFyo RbGenhlx8NOLHsH47gSnE9IpA2kcHsEmffP2E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=GIpZoDwxgeD9y9k 6h2IXegRUaWs=; b=C1TWRwXfMx+v27UYCwzswnaO9w5kjtLjAn+tRWE2pLwpVRi /zoixEMcabzrtLD3NngpCFbiFc/98sQJdz5ofXlxmaGx0iGvZysoTpj12c9CE3V1 TItV4eL1w4KAgrF+tp8pxfncK6XRhtUWAKyum6NstD6936+wraGwasoEOQXc=
X-Sasl-enc: tvyVDsHHhch4Z9nGIb7ngTl6OhQc73+aL4DvnsiXGW2y 1446766370
Received: from [10.24.51.227] (unknown [128.107.241.163]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD48868013E; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:32:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <563BDC41.3030006@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:32:48 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39A1EC5B-9245-41BC-A898-94EB5A0BE9BD@cooperw.in>
References: <20151105023108.17210.54132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <19C90DA9-652D-499F-8462-7EC7878307CB@packetizer.com> <CAKKJt-ci2kndZsxmkUKchWCcEPApvoFT9QMsw6MeC7hfKso3tQ@mail.gmail.com> <D261445D.5E397%eckelcu@cisco.com> <CAKKJt-euqJ6skSf_0ivT04Yi5NpGPBSeWTOOiJRqq5QOrS61xA@mail.gmail.com> <5D0066E2-6BD9-4ED8-A37D-CE83118E099E@cooperw.in> <563BDC41.3030006@alum.mit.edu>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/rQd3L9dKMzVHlB-0xiBa9megSSE>
Cc: bfcpbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:32:53 -0000

> On Nov 6, 2015, at 7:46 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> - You SHOULD do foobar. The only acceptable situation to not do foobar
>  is blah blah blah.
> - It is RECOMMENDED that you do foobar. The only acceptable situation
>  to not do foobar is blah blah blah.

Either of the above would be fine. SHOULD and RECOMMENDED are equivalent according to RFC 2119.

Alissa

> 
> I have had implementers tell me that when they get an assignment to implement a spec, their management tells them to only do the MUSTs, because that is all that is required to satisfy the checkoff!
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status