Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text

+1 for merging the draft to form a WG RFC4582bis draft.

-- Tom

On 06/12/2011, Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
>> Sent: 02 December 2011 17:37
>> To: Jonathan Lennox; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>>
>> +1
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jonathan Lennox
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:28 AM
>> > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> > Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>> >
>> > Draft-sandbakken is structured as a patch to RFC 4582.  I support
>> adopting RFC 4582 as patched by
>> > draft-sandbakken as the WG item.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:22 AM
>> > To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> > Subject: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>> >
>> > (As working group cochair)
>> >
>> > In support of our milestone
>> >
>> > Apr 2012  Draft revision of RFC 4582 to IESG
>> >
>> > it is proposed to adopt:
>> >
>> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sandbakken-dispatch-bfcp-udp-03.txt
>> >
>> > as a draft text for a working group document. An indicative call was
>> already supporting of this in the
>> > face to face meeting.
>> >
>> > Please respond if you either support or do not support the adoption
>> of
>> this text as the basis for the
>> > working group draft.
>> >
>> > Please also respond if you consider there are specific sections that
>> you consider need more work
>> > before adoption. We can leave these sections out (or replace them
>> with
>> a drafting note).
>> >
>> > A reasonable criteria on which to base your judgement is whether the
>> proposed text form a better basis
>> > for moving the discussion forward on any particular issues than a
>> blank sheet of paper (or the
>> > electronic equivalent).
>> >
>> > Please respond by Tuesday December 13th 2011.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Keith
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > bfcpbis mailing list
>> > bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > bfcpbis mailing list
>> > bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>> _______________________________________________
>> bfcpbis mailing list
>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>


-- 
# Cisco                         |  http://www.cisco.com/telepresence/
## tomkrist@cisco.com  |  http://www.tandberg.com
###                               |  http://folk.uio.no/tomkri/