IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-15.txt

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 04 November 2016 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACCD129565 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AacBdhD0kLzW for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4EB129626 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f60a598000000cb2-60-581cd3935a90
Received: from ESESSHC018.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.72]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 15.7E.03250.393DC185; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 19:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.177]) by ESESSHC018.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 19:29:39 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-15.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSLs8iIDRpK07DLEqkhcTWQv2V9qC62r6AgAALdACAACXAcP//83CAgAAr4LCAANCOAIAM+fyAgAA++uA=
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:29:38 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BE1E43C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <E0BFE4A5-6F33-4D5E-84F3-28D14F957A4D@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BC27452@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <ECE36C48-D3E2-4F94-97F1-89C48C27CD89@cisco.com> <FDADA906-1933-40DD-B1A8-9800F8B1567D@cooperw.in> <0D0D949F-A7B1-4B27-A45E-2C799927CC14@cisco.com> <1477504758174.60572@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BDF4C41@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7282fd52-ddb3-4715-acf7-78911c7b063d@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BDF5D56@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <92836402-973C-460E-9AF6-905F399F491B@cisco.com> <1C782CB8-B5D0-4443-9B6B-443D0429C916@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C782CB8-B5D0-4443-9B6B-443D0429C916@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BE1E43CESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7h+6UyzIRBst+cVn8W3eUyWLTrC9s Fis2HGC1WHzgPqsDi8ff9x+YPKb83sjqsWTJT6YA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujFevelkLNt1g rFh/eAljA+ONS4xdjJwcEgImEs/nX2HqYuTiEBJYxyhx8ewPJpCEkMBiRolT8+u6GDk42AQs JLr/aYOERQQaGCXmrqoCsZkFzCSerJvBCmILC7hLnN/ZzQ5R4yFxbEk3K4SdJDHv2QawXSwC KhJ77pwHs3kFfCW23PzFCrH3AYvEphmHwBKcArYSd6e9ZQGxGQXEJL6fWsMEsUxc4taT+UwQ RwtILNlznhnCFpV4+fgfK4StJLHo9meo+nyJKU+nskEsE5Q4OfMJywRGkVlIRs1CUjYLSdks oJeZBTQl1u/ShyhRlJjS/ZAdwtaQaJ0zlx1ZfAEj+ypG0eLU4qTcdCMjvdSizOTi4vw8vbzU kk2MwLg7uOW3wQ7Gl88dDzEKcDAq8fAWLJKJEGJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCG3YBKMSbklhZlVqU H19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZzXbOX9cCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgsEwenVAOjadsuTv0vB5/x/72luOi+ 4sz9vhUlK278PibGuHjmlWmKwtbezQnXJJeu/DJ76mPLB9H3zG9PCn3nY/9sxrOlnDw/bXIc ut6dDxY8YPUndprUEolfqWbWgjftynYvudbr1PPWNSL958KEV9t9pCtO7LEru/d0tgj/3NM3 pjYk9+jFO7z6djNKW4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRAEY/ro+3AgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/sUMFaxZMGioZR1FAHbxVM67prHs>
Cc: "Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)" <snandaku@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-15.txt
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:29:44 -0000

Hi,

We would bring the issue to MMUSIC and see what people say. I don’t think it’s a change that would require bringing the document back to the WG.

Regards,

Christer

From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu) [mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com]
Sent: 04 November 2016 17:43
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>; Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>; bfcpbis@ietf.org
Cc: Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku) <snandaku@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-15.txt

Any thoughts on this? Based on the last call discussions on the draft-mux-attributes, is this an appropriate change and is there still time to make it.

Cheers,
Charles

On 10/27/16, 3:32 AM, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com<mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com>> wrote:

Christer and Paul,

Having taken another look at the mux attributes draft, I think you are both correct.
TBD is defined as follows:

4.9.  Category: TBD

   The attributes in the TBD category have not been analyzed under the
   proposed multiplexing framework and SHOULD NOT be multiplexed.

This seems appropriate not only for bfcpver but also for floorctlr. If we agree to this, the mux attribute draft would need to be updated to reflect this.

Cheers,
Charles

On 10/26/16, 10:08 PM, "bfcpbis on behalf of Christer Holmberg" <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:

Hi,

I wonder whether draft-mux-attributes should define the mux category for attributes associated with BFCP to begin with. Because, IF someone at some point defines how to bundle BFCP, draft-mux-attributes would have to be updated.

Regards,

Christer


-----Original Message-----
From: bfcpbis [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
Sent: 26 October 2016 22:29
To: bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-15.txt

On 10/26/16 2:14 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
Hi,


I don't understand how it can be IDENTICAL if we haven't even defined
how to bundle multiple bfcp streams.

+1

I suspect that the solution to bundling bfcp will be bfcp over data channel.

    Thanks,
    Paul

_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

_______________________________________________
bfcpbis mailing list
bfcpbis@ietf.org<mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email