Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text

+1


/alfred

On 12/6/11 2:45 PM, Tom Kristensen wrote:
> +1 for merging the draft to form a WG RFC4582bis draft.
>
> -- Tom
>
> On 06/12/2011, Hutton, Andrew<andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>  wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
>>> Sent: 02 December 2011 17:37
>>> To: Jonathan Lennox; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Jonathan Lennox
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:28 AM
>>>> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>>>>
>>>> Draft-sandbakken is structured as a patch to RFC 4582.  I support
>>> adopting RFC 4582 as patched by
>>>> draft-sandbakken as the WG item.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:22 AM
>>>> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: [bfcpbis] Consensus call for the adoption of text
>>>>
>>>> (As working group cochair)
>>>>
>>>> In support of our milestone
>>>>
>>>> Apr 2012  Draft revision of RFC 4582 to IESG
>>>>
>>>> it is proposed to adopt:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sandbakken-dispatch-bfcp-udp-03.txt
>>>>
>>>> as a draft text for a working group document. An indicative call was
>>> already supporting of this in the
>>>> face to face meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Please respond if you either support or do not support the adoption
>>> of
>>> this text as the basis for the
>>>> working group draft.
>>>>
>>>> Please also respond if you consider there are specific sections that
>>> you consider need more work
>>>> before adoption. We can leave these sections out (or replace them
>>> with
>>> a drafting note).
>>>>
>>>> A reasonable criteria on which to base your judgement is whether the
>>> proposed text form a better basis
>>>> for moving the discussion forward on any particular issues than a
>>> blank sheet of paper (or the
>>>> electronic equivalent).
>>>>
>>>> Please respond by Tuesday December 13th 2011.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>> _______________________________________________
>> bfcpbis mailing list
>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>
>
>