IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7CD3A0893 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltPXqB7lF_TN for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1787E3A088C for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 567D79A325E54E0B812F for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:57:19 +0000
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:57:17 +0800
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:57:17 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
Thread-Index: AdYBJLWKUfb086XdQbyATX2XwlF2UAAGnCyAACkHDiA=
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:57:16 +0000
Message-ID: <f465f49f53534122aaffe4d651e08467@huawei.com>
References: <b9c7b88960764dc4aa4454eac2310160@huawei.com> <m2blom1or0.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2blom1or0.wl-randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.175.99]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/0FyzRAMm_DOyK9DSvwcHIYjA7mE>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:57:26 -0000

Hi Randy, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 10:16 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual
> meeting
> 
> > 2. How we worked during the past 2 months
> 
> email distributions by time and by person
> 
> > 3. The collected requirements: the minimal set of common ones and the
> >    union of other requirements
> 
> would like to see these two lists again, requirements and agreed non-
> requirements

The collected requirements can be found at: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/a6JCSbhvCFiqJG1TUeZTFyTeFj4/

Note in that mail they are categorized as common requirements, union of other functional requirements and requirements about design principle.

And based on the recent discussion, "Discover the role of the connected nodes" will be added to the list of "common requirements"

> 
> > 4. The list of current solution drafts
> 
> i would not call them solution drafts.  more various efforts in this space from
> which it would be good to steal

Or maybe could call them existing proposals. 

Best regards,
Jie

> 
> randy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email