Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 24 February 2020 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DD73A1279 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:01:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trS0QSi0BFj1 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B40F3A1257 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id g64so9850717otb.13 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:01:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=64xIVdSCGI/avLrI+PnsoRvCFrAPBQXBRHue5gMPUcI=; b=XdarxcG+snYKjdoDBU2PVBPa992IW3zfpZ1QdUZnatpGxT1rT5d1ma1GbhhZxycYPV XhxLMB5fBy6y2YyPuYc3a87rG3viQlxMzHLnzsjf8Wy00HWeSaijXxP8S9qQ+VT7387Q m5BSCnQcVl5MJHzD1vs+Mrev7GNICRIfllA1pTYSelrUix6WvVjbyB0+OWPgqsisFu2X E6d8hC2FRqwiwJLrtHT/cKSe5GAv1GbhWSn9XrwxQhqBwsaOV7aNDbRbcGLSh8pQ2DLn B3a6WGoWS5I1U0jWmNM91JmfpymId6Yv/Ha54tQ3EONngoyWp4Oi8YBI/gNeBrrInswU IiMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=64xIVdSCGI/avLrI+PnsoRvCFrAPBQXBRHue5gMPUcI=; b=aBaJx8H13bTh5wct4oNvEOaZvTqgYz1UI0qBE6rrIdTqSvyDipOU+jv/RL0SoQihe4 sll/s/hugl/AOdCMank5XoAsrsjgod4l8KAuFePzqkgQBiVjQuQIdGm4ZfrvVyAGAEXw y/NURearZtP4hEhUruVhIgw9oRfA5RHM0yQS1owc7XeZ2w9yAq5MSZqo0ePqfUYSfZDC I3VEwW2NjQ5EEiRXM69EDOs5fb7yy4lgxKF961SZduJsyh5rXWzw5CxnltiUHGpB1yPm 3x3uYbsiXyZEMERHV9G9UXTCgDGDDXKySwC7duQuEaOI0A7R0irqlMftDqKeehfTDDCv VPVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3QMlJZVW0hD2/ffbJoBfLpfHTZ9arpxyxrzLnxwNpXFQFQ/Qw PujJgni60pIpfCxM5ukIIwtOP91WHjGs0PzrstJxSwSH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznCCR4yLFfEWtRmn/3dFlijQyy9qw0AK5BIc0RLikA/w73E/wRjQvJXBB/v5UEt0ydo6JJNwnz/5jD1JLO9Sw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7083:: with SMTP id l3mr39543058otj.193.1582574515242; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:01:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com> <CAOj+MMG2wLNf-1sD+RbTCxocFsPViASr47vy-6TZCeFOhjTSmw@mail.gmail.com> <a674af06587440d4b2143961084680cd@huawei.com> <CAOj+MMFhbXOUmEnQs7WHJWAhkY3A--KVs3sUM4jHu9sMTEQznw@mail.gmail.com> <d29ee4053a8046049381874b6aa28134@huawei.com> <CAOj+MMG2RGT_fQfh+tty654L6x88qRrr83NJRi5UOXV_bEWZqw@mail.gmail.com> <m2blpnzs8t.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2blpnzs8t.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:01:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGVUDBQ9AGLPuSGSiQ9ni-r+j=NbnYTWxw=Xv+53Ls0vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfdc70059f57d72e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/7z03WzzQ0W12GjJZ19s48YUo_Is>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 20:02:03 -0000

All times you provides are just perfect !

Thx Randy.

PS. I still think we should prepare a bit better for such call in terms of
previously prepared interactive document.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:43 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > So who exactly from those who proposed a documents in this space and is
> > part of the DT based in Asia ?
>
> i bounce back and forth, was in tokyo last week, californica this
>
> i do congratulate the group on the longest thread i have seen in a long
> time discussing a con call.  and i have at least three con calls a week
> with particupants in emea, noam, and asia (and sometimes points south).
>
> there are generally two slots which work
>
>     UTC 22:00
>     CET 23:00
>     JST 07:00+1
>     EST 17:00
>     PST 14:00
>
> and
>
>     UTC 14:00
>     CET 15:00
>     JST 23:00
>     EST 09:00
>     PST 06:00
>
> yes, someone has to suffer.  the world is round; get over it.
>
> randy
>