IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 21 February 2020 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AAD1200DB; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:44:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOts4Ntolibz; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4FCE1200D5; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.99;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Dongjie \(Jimmy\)'" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Cc: <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com> <005e01d5e903$5993f4a0$0cbbdde0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <005e01d5e903$5993f4a0$0cbbdde0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:43:54 -0500
Message-ID: <001501d5e908$657a6d30$306f4790$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01D5E8DE.7CA4B350"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLkik2WzbGIkvao+B6kyayluAQNeQH6PLg2pfkoUJA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200221-0, 02/21/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/CXsHUFjnzudfkAJBOmOTHhWVAow>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:44:06 -0000

Hi all:

 

Jie Dong - is the person who handle the email/doodle poll for setting up the
time.  There is not a time set-up at this time.   If you wish to set-up via
email, I suggest sending email to Jie Dong.  I was simply informing Jie Dong
that when you are ready - I will set-up the conference call on the IDR Web. 

 

It is now Saturday 6:43am Beijing time. I suggest waiting for 3-4 hours.  He
will probably answer you sometime this evening. 

 

Cheers, 

 

Sue 

 

From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 5:08 PM
To: 'Dongjie (Jimmy)'; bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?

 

Jie:

 

You can use the webex for IDR.   I will set it up for you. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

 

From: Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Dongjie (Jimmy)
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 5:06 AM
To: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?

 

Dear all,

 

The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to reach
consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could review
the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements.

 

Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may help
us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I'd suggest we arrange a 1-hour
conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are located
in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the 9:00
(UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day. 

 

Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential
time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks.

 

https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya

 

Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the
meeting. I'm not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the
design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I'd
appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance.

 

Best regards,

Jie

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email