IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

" 徐小虎(义先) " <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB9E3A07CE; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:10:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_PIZr0IwcvH; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out0-157.mail.aliyun.com (out0-157.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686FB3A07CC; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:10:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1582672241; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=kB0tzZ9Iy2LaqO7pY3xkvAusewPBxmNd94JPZv2geZQ=; b=X8QtQZhYZnN6/JInoXrTluYrex8RSRRMfh4RTXDzxAoIz3scC9Fk5EqYodHNnzNv3XWWwQssyI1QNlzIY0H1QgAfq01MTdiTgJorbq6X78TjMNuCRw2u/BW/9S7V79kDaE4btrDC7gZzMlU7rh+KHYpAnivNlD4pZjObBWUHCPY=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R181e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03312; MF=xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=2; SR=0; TI=W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_0AC264DF_1582604584229_o7001c408k;
Received: from WS-web (xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com[W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_0AC264DF_1582604584229_o7001c408k]) by e01l04363.eu6 at Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:10:40 +0800
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:10:40 +0800
From: "=?UTF-8?B?5b6Q5bCP6JmOKOS5ieWFiCk=?=" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
To: "Bgp-autoconf" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>, "bgp autoconf" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "=?UTF-8?B?5b6Q5bCP6JmOKOS5ieWFiCk=?=" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <19806d22-d8bd-4a4c-b034-4bce3e282e55.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 59873560][W4_5790132][v5ForWebDing][Safari]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m2v9nvxsc6.wl-randy@psg.com>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_NjATW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTJfNikgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNjA1LjEuMTUgKEtIVE1MLCBsaWtlIEdlY2tvKSBWZXJzaW9uLzEyLjAuMyBTYWZhcmkvNjA1LjEuMTU=XQ
In-Reply-To: <m2v9nvxsc6.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_15135_4a61a940_5e55a970_2dbed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/CrdCvlbsEeVdSeZEQWBNGCvV6c0>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] =?utf-8?q?assumptions?=
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:10:47 -0000

Hi all,

I'm fine with those assumptions except item 2.  I think we need some clarification. It's sure that we are not changing the current BGP mechanism. However, as for which protocol should be used for BGP peer autodiscovery, we should not exclude BGP on purpose.

Best regards,
Xiaohu 






------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Send Time:2020年2月25日(星期二) 11:24
To:bgp autoconf <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject:[Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

some underlying assumptions:

  o with a datacenter, not inter-datacenter

  o we are not changing bgp

  o we will not force major change on the operator's architecture

  o attempt to be minimal

randy

-- 
Bgp-autoconf mailing list
Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email