Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 23 February 2020 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7D93A1046; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FS7qaFLn0NOj; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0650F3A1048; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id p11so3211215plq.10; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=zFaVFYx8rWlKGRtmr1T/09ESMjbo4c8RcAH3dj1wH38=; b=hpo8LG9uZj5PcIQKIfSjvnAfMuEg06Lr/cWHWXK9rhQVLqrkl8HYcguC64abFAP8IW HCZWg50Ev+F6wkHr20dNC3TR8Z7ocip+7Sao5QpUMCyHME1WV/4HaEmmrKmmAE67pkTV g5Cl3ViCgHHaQcPWNEMD/QzSsewN4bOpqptm4Z62Xr/0Z7TqIombEwAEra2TiyT5jkKJ AFrVnXjK0TJZdbVh6SJ2tMw+DlvISPegECBIj99iBBWnWf8Ii9sCEsdNLsUL/1OIH1iM SSsSSOstujfLvVZLRtwbbjSePrDO4sDhMO3MINlG9qB+FSx9N5uS7201Jy7rfSh9jAus NmFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=zFaVFYx8rWlKGRtmr1T/09ESMjbo4c8RcAH3dj1wH38=; b=eS7SmOqDMRLGi6NrXe39OpILs+44fSQmIEYukADFHlzdGMnHM9Sdiu0KVvBPSFmhZl 9zW82ERlXMoSM5Zl+iWFU45dtGxVMpAbU4fXeNH1edrHfApFQK+LBqM6h7+xlc3Uz+YV DH37kb00YzOeUe4J6d5UrM8BRqX9woc79Kdsk666gNJsLDvK0S2BBH88KSW6/pQr71IQ 8el6JsFaxz6M7CKcE6QUxF3bsr0um9aacsIpqCb23QJ81wQw4CsocS5Zye05q4TwGiEj YYhIi/m9lK0uzXFza8FlnihHk15guOIoE5TferpCUuoj6GxjePJAsS0WMP9S3+Q40ctd RnTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVxprO0WXhoxLasXhdUOjz4vD8iBtsojxNsxxsPaurw62/OuB1D TtScKMayMp70sl6ZeD0HRu4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9csGJDVYube4arxmdfmELO3mv1UXx7bAeu/xEcji+Nt4RKI3/uX8etnilDwBw/LZlNEn6Ew==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd98:: with SMTP id q24mr47653348pls.205.1582495865309; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:8432:cff6:7403:351e:eb41:e035? ([2607:fb90:8432:cff6:7403:351e:eb41:e035]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm10024234pjg.0.2020.02.23.14.11.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-EB9B2351-B838-41A4-A7F0-D4C4111392AB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:11:00 -0800
Message-Id: <8D7B251E-9D3A-45CF-824A-A4419021BB15@gmail.com>
References: <000301d5ea92$538f9060$faaeb120$@ndzh.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, bgp-autoconf@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <000301d5ea92$538f9060$faaeb120$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/K2k_3tifRQj5Cmeo8fHOmuevJqI>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:11:08 -0000

Sue, 

Please send out a meeting invite, so noone gets confused about their respective timezones.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Feb 23, 2020, at 13:44, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Greetings all:
>  
> I think I’ve schedule a conference call for bgp-autconf at 9:00pm EDT on 2/24/2020 which should align with Jie Dong’s meeting.
>  
> What I get is the IDR working group webex
>  
> https://ietf.webex.com/meet/idr  -
>  
> I will be online starting the meeting at 8:50pm EDT, and I’ll be a silent partner to make sure this works correctly.
>  
> In the future Jie Dong (WG secretary) will be able to schedule meetings. 
>  
> Acee – if you have more experience with the web-ex, can you send me email offline.
>  
> Sue Hares
>  
>  
>  
> From: Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2020 11:38 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy); Robert Raszuk
> Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
>  
> That is 1 AM for Sue and I, not sure if I will attend. Please record.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
> From: Bgp-autoconf <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> Date: Sunday, February 23, 2020 at 9:17 AM
> To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
> Cc: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>rg>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
>  
> Hi Robert,
>  
> Sorry I thought you were also in N.A. While the doodle includes the morning time in Europe, the current survey shows most people chose the time slots which may not be convenient for European participants.
>  
> According to the survey result, for the upcoming conference call we will choose February 24 18:00 (UTC-8), which is February 25 10:00 (UTC+8). For future meetings we could have another doodle poll if necessary.
>  
> Sue, please help to set up the conference call, many thanks.
>  
> Best regards,
> Jie
>  
> From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:robert@raszuk.net] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2020 1:15 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
>  
> Europe
>  
> Thx,
> R.
>  
>  
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>  
> Thanks for your reply.
>  
> 8:00-15:00 PST would be 24:00-7:00 Beijing time (the next day).  I was trying to make the time acceptable to both Asia and N.A. participants. May I know which time zone are you in?
>  
> The conference call proposal is just to speed up the design team discussion and hope to hear more opinions from the team members, everything could still be discussed on the mail list. Thanks.
>  
> Best regards,
> Jie
>  
> From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:robert@raszuk.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 6:21 AM
> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
>  
> May we have it 8:00-15:00 PST instead ? 
>  
> Also what can't be discussed over email ?
>  
> Thx,
> R.
>  
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:06 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>  
> The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to reach consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could review the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements.
>  
> Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may help us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I’d suggest we arrange a 1-hour conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are located in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the 9:00 (UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day.
>  
> Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks.
>  
> https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya
>  
> Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the meeting. I’m not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I’d appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance.
>  
> Best regards,
> Jie
> -- 
> Bgp-autoconf mailing list
> Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
> -- 
> Bgp-autoconf mailing list
> Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf