Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf requirements and design principle
"徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 01:47 UTC
Return-Path: <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2363A0BF5; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8ObFbucDZA8; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-146.mail.aliyun.com (out0-146.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557803A0BF2; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1594259226; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=sIvpu1O6COiRxSPxF1GM47awxGoV/CPz9XnWkx37o0k=; b=A8J8uoc1lTkS9cK8s5S4uTJiKUKq31OlFv3ojVQVi3QITDdLx2ClvcU3Bmfe5b/zy/BnVwwofTWFUQnP22WW/sYLK2DiYb32+JO02JoRYOJR+K/+iK3a5As8qSwfatB5P66u919d7pdovNAsrH3zLQM/mQ6wkc6Jn/elrkOUeiM=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R131e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03302; MF=xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=5; SR=0; TI=W4_5922738_v5ForWebDing_0A930F78_1594259224798_o7001c1099;
Received: from WS-web (xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com[W4_5922738_v5ForWebDing_0A930F78_1594259224798_o7001c1099]) by e02c03305.eu6 at Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:47:04 +0800
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:47:04 +0800
From: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Bgp-autoconf <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <78c33d9e-5e62-4619-a199-4de94ce6aae5.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent][W4_5922738][v5ForWebDing][Safari]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0d8841f4daf143439a237c91333744e4@huawei.com> <m2tv0172cl.wl-randy@psg.com> <6e6dca9ffe9b41839419715e1608ddef@huawei.com> <8d21cc950f784675a0f52fdf22f546e5@huawei.com> <CAOj+MME75tzRUm2PasSWfxSvEcO3tUix2fPHT=jm8wOjgXa0Hw@mail.gmail.com> <m2pn98ej2e.wl-randy@psg.com> <d5303a4df7834cbb9ed3c09831332b65@huawei.com>, <ef565f58-c871-49ef-95c2-66cd5da62164@Spark>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_5922738_v5ForWebDing_NjATW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTJfNikgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNjA1LjEuMTUgKEtIVE1MLCBsaWtlIEdlY2tvKSBWZXJzaW9uLzEyLjAuMyBTYWZhcmkvNjA1LjEuMTU=XQ
In-Reply-To: <ef565f58-c871-49ef-95c2-66cd5da62164@Spark>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_114428_548fe940_5f067718_1798cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/ToOqheFwQ4V5BWmMboLtwCekhEI>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf requirements and design principle
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 01:47:15 -0000
+1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ From:Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Send Time:2020年7月9日(星期四) 02:02 To:Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> Cc:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org> Subject:Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf requirements and design principle Jie, Sounds good, I don’t really see any convergence yet, so unbiased summary would be a great start Cheers, Jeff On Jul 8, 2020, 8:47 AM -0700, Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>, wrote: Hi Randy and all, It is good we agreed on the scope of this document is DC. Certainly in the design team we can analyze and discuss the difference between the design for DC and WAN, my understanding is the details about it does not belong to this document. Coming back to the preparation of the draft deliverable, in addition to revising the existing text in the draft, my suggestion is to also add some brief description about each candidate solution regarding the functions, extensibility, etc., this may be similar to what was presented in the slides to the WG in last IETF meeting. I will work on some text and provide an update tomorrow. Any contribution to this is welcome. As for the design principle (including which layer the protocol should be based on and the interaction with BGP), if we cannot reach agreement before the meeting, probably we could provide a summary of the considerations first, and ask for some feedbacks from the WG. Thoughts? Best regards, Jie -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 11:53 PM To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; bgp-autoconf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf requirements and design principle The draft in question specifically adds WAN auto conf. that was certainly not the intent; and it's not really there in the words.. on the other hand, if we should keep an eye on the WAN as we design the LAN, we should be aware of choices which might unnecessarily restriict ourselves next year. Then the L3 peer auto discovery is just deferred to draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl also not intended. i did ask for your help stitching multicast in, and you declined. perhaps you have time now. However reading thorough draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl it is clear that it is not applicable to WAN. it is not applicable to many things :) as i said at the beginning, i do not think l3dl is really a serious candidate here. otoh, we would be silly if we did not keep an eye to see if there are lessons to be learned from it. [ fwiw, i think the scalability added to lsoe to become l3dl was not worth the complexity. but that is a discussion for another universe ] randy -- Bgp-autoconf mailing list Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
- [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf req… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… 徐小虎(义先)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Robert Raszuk
- [Bgp-autoconf] 回复: Move forward with bgp autoconf… 徐小虎(义先)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] 回复: Move forward with bgp auto… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… 徐小虎(义先)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Move forward with bgp autoconf… Dongjie (Jimmy)