Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 21 February 2020 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D091200C3;
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:07:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 2lS6ONMHJROm; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com
(50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C8612008A;
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:07:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS))
x-ip-name=166.177.57.99;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Dongjie \(Jimmy\)'" <jie.dong@huawei.com>,
<bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Cc: <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:07:46 -0500
Message-ID: <005e01d5e903$5993f4a0$0cbbdde0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005F_01D5E8D9.70C03690"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLkik2WzbGIkvao+B6kyayluAQNeaYI8fRg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200221-0, 02/21/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/VKVt8hMS4SjzwGCM2XuOMfgEgsY>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list
<bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:07:58 -0000
Jie: You can use the webex for IDR. I will set it up for you. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 5:06 AM To: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements? Dear all, The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to reach consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could review the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements. Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may help us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I'd suggest we arrange a 1-hour conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are located in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the 9:00 (UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day. Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks. https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the meeting. I'm not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I'd appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Jie
- [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- [Bgp-autoconf] 回复: A conference call in next week… 徐小虎(义先)