Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Sat, 28 March 2020 02:01 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFE43A0D5D; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68dr24eQUMzF; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ACD23A0E4C; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 19:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 47A4B2265FD76B131B72; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 02:01:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 02:01:26 +0000
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by dggeme701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:01:24 +0800
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:01:24 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
Thread-Index: AQHWBGE76oEMJV5ehUqccgYU2A27RKhcdroAgADJY4A=
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 02:01:20 +0000
Message-ID: <d2940f50449a4aa5be7bc16b0e2ace93@huawei.com>
References: <0b815dc7cf3f4eaa99448893e2bcd72d@huawei.com> <m2k135vfxs.wl-randy@psg.com> <m2a741v4sv.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2a741v4sv.wl-randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.211]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/VW7cobDLdN3iNuMCfmUsRB2N-lM>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 02:01:41 -0000
Hi Randy, Thanks a lot for your suggestion. They sound reasonable, I will make some change to the slides. Best regards, Jie -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 5:58 AM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting jimmy > you might explain "Union of others" a bit more as suggested features > we have NOT adopted but may still consider. and, actually, in a formal sense, it is not a union at all. looks more like a (laundry) list to me. randy
- [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress re… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progres… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progres… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progres… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progres… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progres… Dongjie (Jimmy)