Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50493A0798 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:56:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Van2PfH+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=bT4zxnQE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2GUtPmqerb0 for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52E0B3A0797 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:56:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2144; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1582671389; x=1583880989; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2uLW9rmlAICxlc2J3RExQrbiHVWZ1rWUzkjarvuDkZk=; b=Van2PfH+K41EwUk2izREWTYAsXSfFTUkm7HxSKDsmjXiwtSe6Vle5Kip RcqgF/Vu04fxmP9qDaLby7HPTIriwi8G9xpwO/4p5RBQQhe5uP7ICcGi7 ZpntpJ89uEX4uh7UVDr4Q/ZJQYnH4e1rBY3OU3naGrY8oGQG4T9zCNSBT M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A6h5WVBx3MrKMmH/XCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9p?= =?us-ascii?q?sgjfdUf7+++4j5YRGN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A+GsHbIQKUh?= =?us-ascii?q?YEjcsMmAl1CcWIBGXwLeXhaGoxG8ERHFI=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BQAQBwpVVe/4YNJK1lGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7AoFSUAVsWCAECyqEFINGA4pzgjoliWOOMYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?SA1QJAQEBDAEBGAsKAgQBAYRAAheBZyQ4EwIDDQEBBQEBAQIBBQRthTcMQhY?= =?us-ascii?q?BhQoBAQEBAgEBARAREQwBASwLAQ8CAQgSBgICJgICAh8GCxUCDgIEAQ0FIoM?= =?us-ascii?q?EAYJKAw4gAQ6jawKBOYhidYEygn8BAQWCRIJFDQuCDAMGgQ4qAYwjGoIAgTg?= =?us-ascii?q?MFIJMPoIbSQEBAoR0MoIskGWecUQKgjySL4Q2HJsujnCLKpAdAgQCBAUCDgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBYFpIoFYcBU7KgGCQVAYDY4dg3OFFIVBdAKBJ4pHhW8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,485,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="436890940"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 Feb 2020 22:56:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01PMuSnB029868 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:56:28 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:56:27 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:56:26 -0500
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:56:26 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dqKtQ6HPkAkV6egYSaazkeyBDHo1F2EOvlZY1qg5lNNx26+s/8y+hYeaVfYyNfksU+y3SNNXyrWYE0jcSKowG5Bkn4ok/NZkPtE73Rbduv6aqmN2RyEyiowiB7HN93a4CVOK/3cNtx0IIJBEphhokj0SRRiydV2LHW9V1ysuCuSBpSCpLhpVM3lCmCJ5A06LioFMbMl1wHAyV5T8EHSXJ/MTtLRDH9tNVadByVtU6ohxkYGpnA+Cwz99XZEgPwTa1nJV+n/WaD/Px0XLKWJb4zC02EIaVgs9crUewFGuSKodOi7GILKw1Wr85QlA7xUTJzoaopESfCy617r0I7ugRw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2uLW9rmlAICxlc2J3RExQrbiHVWZ1rWUzkjarvuDkZk=; b=FSjxvKS5sxjBAxTM5QSHNi2mqEwPik6ucKVtbRIZ1Ix5B9eKWc39EQrRp+ZXJ+sGLPAgS6sbop0LYIiI2hpJAz3VrMMrHt+bH5jjSi6wJCPLkkuHisgVQ7O+JoniVl8kwVmsbg2khrB25ILnRuJN/77QILXEuM77Qms2m/CjVzDzamMoObwD5PNgVbpGuNT6nmtbF9wFEEOmOfEbRUaIUiNdTQd5SKdckDGc9lPZZY6rV+fFjTFZ1cr4+RPQ9mOZb0DFxws8nfPhnfJZwZm8RCxRyG5yhc1YwLOn6f8T1wDw2kBE0D4MPWoFDDNKecnNkJgHVakLONfsmhNnlnTZ8g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2uLW9rmlAICxlc2J3RExQrbiHVWZ1rWUzkjarvuDkZk=; b=bT4zxnQEQD3ivfC/E1Cxznw8+m44FqhvOCaPOWT9pf6tnlgNmBzsUXnuHMZ5KGuyGt9HYgqbow2upDZdk85i4MO3ElGTyYl1uqUTJ+m5LrTQdDPJOYkT9M5mw42u9hj3eEsLXZWYiR1PVHLLLyJxK9up2liCHRk3YiqSd7jMx6s=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:8f::13) by BN8PR11MB3777.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:8e::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.17; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:56:25 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d939:a6fb:475:cddd]) by BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d939:a6fb:475:cddd%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:56:25 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, bgp autoconf <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions
Thread-Index: AQHV64sN4sbUrlSYXUii9TaDs8ghHagrgV4AgAECJwD//68vgA==
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:56:25 +0000
Message-ID: <1BA856B0-4CDD-4546-B8C1-D8CA91A30966@cisco.com>
References: <73E23EF6-D901-4199-800E-49BFABD1FBC5@cisco.com> <B1919BA6-CE7C-4949-AABE-C98D7C64367F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B1919BA6-CE7C-4949-AABE-C98D7C64367F@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::68]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d56c2a00-f032-4b84-baee-08d7ba45f136
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3777:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB3777343BBD702F8897C6F12DC2ED0@BN8PR11MB3777.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0324C2C0E2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(966005)(71200400001)(478600001)(86362001)(36756003)(2616005)(186003)(91956017)(76116006)(316002)(2906002)(8936002)(54906003)(5660300002)(6512007)(4326008)(66946007)(6486002)(53546011)(6506007)(81156014)(66446008)(33656002)(8676002)(110136005)(66556008)(66476007)(81166006)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR11MB3777; H:BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: JqFwY43KplsgVWoJJ/0V0gI/m1jpyYMAMoNDVeEe+Ps7W7HgS4ADRp5HYiTCepZlLmYHCYcHIw2l8r1i3kDUrZDN59wx5BfD3cXrUFxPamXMv+tiPaVPYyIhO9VQ+9H6iybkqLY40z33pdbDeP7Yods74z8yEUKB9Gdqv7/s/vQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <84F1B45CDDB4684999560828A8C09C11@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d56c2a00-f032-4b84-baee-08d7ba45f136
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Feb 2020 22:56:25.7390 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: h79e3Q1RAp21oe55trjdgmqnwaGqoeLOEtcVoRM6YMTnm5HsQUs8ZPmFPeynBuhn
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3777
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/Ya18bkzeiG7WIdjzSAue00hvKHQ>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:56:32 -0000


On 2/25/20, 5:46 PM, "Bgp-autoconf on behalf of Jeff Tantsura" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    Acee,
    
    I disagree, there’s a difference between changing BGP semantics and adding lightweighted AD function on top.

Both are modifications to the BGP protocol - the statement was unqualified. 

Acee
    
    Regards,
    Jeff
    
    > On Feb 25, 2020, at 04:21, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > 
    > Hi Randy, 
    > 
    > On 2/24/20, 10:24 PM, "Bgp-autoconf on behalf of Randy Bush" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of randy@psg.com> wrote:
    > 
    >    some underlying assumptions:
    > 
    >      o with a datacenter, not inter-datacenter
    > 
    >      o we are not changing bgp
    > 
    > This would disqualify LDP-esque mechanisms being added to BGP and we'd have one less draft to consider __
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    > 
    >      o we will not force major change on the operator's architecture
    > 
    >      o attempt to be minimal
    > 
    >    randy
    > 
    >    -- 
    >    Bgp-autoconf mailing list
    >    Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
    >    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
    > 
    > 
    > -- 
    > Bgp-autoconf mailing list
    > Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
    
    -- 
    Bgp-autoconf mailing list
    Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf