Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?

So who exactly from those who proposed a documents in this space and is
part of the DT based in Asia ?

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 3:17 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
> Sorry I thought you were also in N.A. While the doodle includes the
> morning time in Europe, the current survey shows most people chose the time
> slots which may not be convenient for European participants.
>
>
>
> According to the survey result, for the upcoming conference call we will
> choose February 24 18:00 (UTC-8), which is February 25 10:00 (UTC+8). For
> future meetings we could have another doodle poll if necessary.
>
>
>
> Sue, please help to set up the conference call, many thanks.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jie
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Raszuk [mailto:robert@raszuk.net <robert@raszuk.net>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 23, 2020 1:15 AM
> *To:* Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss
> BGP autoconf requirements?
>
>
>
> Europe
>
>
>
> Thx,
> R.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> 8:00-15:00 PST would be 24:00-7:00 Beijing time (the next day).  I was
> trying to make the time acceptable to both Asia and N.A. participants. May
> I know which time zone are you in?
>
>
>
> The conference call proposal is just to speed up the design team
> discussion and hope to hear more opinions from the team members, everything
> could still be discussed on the mail list. Thanks.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jie
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Raszuk [mailto:robert@raszuk.net]
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 22, 2020 6:21 AM
> *To:* Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> *Cc:* bgp-autoconf@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss
> BGP autoconf requirements?
>
>
>
> May we have it 8:00-15:00 PST instead ?
>
>
>
> Also what can't be discussed over email ?
>
>
>
> Thx,
>
> R.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:06 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to
> reach consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could
> review the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements.
>
>
>
> Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may
> help us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I’d suggest we arrange a
> 1-hour conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are
> located in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the
> 9:00 (UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day.
>
>
>
> Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential
> time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks.
>
>
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya
>
>
>
> Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the
> meeting. I’m not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the
> design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I’d
> appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jie
>
> --
> Bgp-autoconf mailing list
> Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
>
>