Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Auto Session Setup
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 01 February 2020 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E90120125
for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:50:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id rEhZYZk865EH for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692B612007C
for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id b18so10887393oie.2
for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:50:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=DmOuj0tlUo0JfR/L5OBt/6yi4jnibfo3jP1YeG5KCk8=;
b=TSz9wMAKljRlHKd14dKI6TzYcYMyJRi0OviyyZCGCDWsmmN6EENG3tZUZmO4sbTb/U
Iyb9cNQENFcxOY74YGtVTZr2uz6SzXN05kolGcB9gJrocF/FdKy9DwI8Z3IRYHKfDVap
4Q7tJjBwIyABsrBXf42p948v1h9mSD8MERHhgJcgaIrgqv0mUYv8c6ss5iZwbLDAHgiK
N9WrphE/WrOwsF/UIgbVbpme8DSklijm/8rS1FQR15CjvXV2JGTbbqWZhICAaO6hGGSA
be2YD2Q14GM8CaS3FN0TCVBFLTzxYa/RrNjiQcPnL6LhRGp2gCfElHEW/CfAcxfkX9AV
hRiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=DmOuj0tlUo0JfR/L5OBt/6yi4jnibfo3jP1YeG5KCk8=;
b=j5RNrhV6Te9cO3no744KGaMuX/j9qM9jvP6EX1IZmtql1V2p2/YXyC8iXO8v/F5XUe
YydwFC3WnrigWymDOaB04UGfKdtcOKa/EP9b/EN1Dn1AIcZVIXhESQ0TphX7BrCTn4kD
iw1SxLsKT+pcDpIoHEthDFGzKKl2zMekB+9wHPtkhCVyjD6/eT75DpmkvjCIxpT47Fmk
sAU3b4c9T5n+b6hGV0SiT+LykbLS7vZFQYvC5L9lqa1yojFB2K2qLg/LbyLIQ9VDHpSx
igfCSloE+YucNRU2AsdjDnXICcFFZX43tBPQIbamCW1HO/6Oy4o1opOGQgdXNhjd+kl4
Co5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWl6oWyxygNPE3fONPRxBbOYw9c6PhvZUO4/SlHtd1C1LfOcLeM
K7k66pWpILWe1KU46cdZlod0qIg7hCeU/vWtZ05kKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6wa7g5lTKHv6UeodtHKquM6H6/rWKBSrVtmL4MDzUPPRTbMShJEjup7+ZJOMDj9uHy/5nwXzr2+oqzQgEvw8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4306:: with SMTP id q6mr10288947oia.54.1580586620614;
Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:50:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3c9dde3ee70848369ddfda10cb7e2545@huawei.com>
<BDD2024B-7FE1-47BF-8373-E4AF86CA303D@gmail.com>
<121F6959-842D-43A8-AF01-33D84A2FC8CE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <121F6959-842D-43A8-AF01-33D84A2FC8CE@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 20:50:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGjtXq-nT07EGJtxdihPXvBN_Lp9HBdbdPh6LTukeYeQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>,
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>,
"bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f0b0f059d890055"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/dyfWfVH78t1laUfjkkhNPC38f5U>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Auto Session Setup
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list
<bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 19:50:23 -0000
Hi Acee, Sure we can do better, but the question to state is *better* really required ? In other words what cases are not solved by using link local addresses for p2p peering ? Just FYI ... Even Google GCP is using link local addresses to establish private BGP peering to your VPC :). Thx, R. On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 8:15 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote: > I agree as well. We already have a partial solution for DC where > implementations are using IPv6 ND RA messages to ascertain the link-local > address on P2P fabric addresses. The BGP speakers then peer on the > link-local addresses. RFC 5549 is then used for IPv4 routes. Of course, we > can do a lot better than that. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > *From: *Bgp-autoconf <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jeff > Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> > *Date: *Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 11:45 AM > *To: *Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com> > *Cc: *"bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>rg>, Robert Raszuk < > robert@raszuk.net> > *Subject: *Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Auto > Session Setup > > > > +1 > > Regards, > > Jeff > > > > On Jan 31, 2020, at 22:17, Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote: > > Hi Robert and Jeff, > > > > Yes I also think we’ve agreed to treat them separately. Then the next > question is which scenario(s) would be the first target for this design > team? My personal feeling is there may be more interests to work on the DC > case first. What do you think? > > > > Best regards, > > Jie > > > > *From:* Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of > *Robert Raszuk > *Sent:* Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:14 PM > *To:* Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> > *Cc:* bgp-autoconf@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Auto > Session Setup > > > > Cool - then we accomplished first design team milestone :) > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:12 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> > wrote: > > A statement with a question mark ;-) > To rephrase - I think we have already agreed. > > Regards, > Jeff > > > On Jan 30, 2020, at 13:08, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > To my feeling we have already agreed to treat them separately? > > > > Is that a question or a statement ? > > > > > > > >
- [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Au… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Fwd: BGP Auto Discovery and BG… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] BGP Auto Discovery and BGP Aut… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)