Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Sat, 22 February 2020 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC74120052;
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 06:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id zIPq4-ZQfUiF; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 06:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F6D12001A;
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 06:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106])
by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C70FC3EBD8BD5C989764;
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:26:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.155) by
lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:26:41 +0000
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.156) by
nkgeml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id
15.1.1713.5; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:26:38 +0800
Received: from nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.156]) by
nkgeml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.156]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004;
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:26:38 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk
<robert@raszuk.net>
CC: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org"
<idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?
Thread-Index: AdXoneGeq7UxQ91YQV2Dhzv5vvtPdwAJEQGAAABj1oAAMgstcA==
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:26:38 +0000
Message-ID: <c490ccd56e5c476693c6bf17b0956b6e@huawei.com>
References: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com>
<CAOj+MMG2wLNf-1sD+RbTCxocFsPViASr47vy-6TZCeFOhjTSmw@mail.gmail.com>
<10B94B2F-D680-441E-87C1-4F6A29E81BD2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <10B94B2F-D680-441E-87C1-4F6A29E81BD2@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.215.90]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_c490ccd56e5c476693c6bf17b0956b6ehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/fMlJzQ3eRoZnFRy7WgaSYiuLYZg>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list
<bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:26:45 -0000
Hi Mankamana, It is good to see you have participated in the doodle. Thanks. Best regards, Jie From: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) [mailto:mankamis@cisco.com] Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 6:32 AM To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>et>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements? I don’t doodle link working to select time. From: Bgp-autoconf <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> Date: Friday, February 21, 2020 at 2:21 PM To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> Cc: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org<mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org<mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>" <idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements? May we have it 8:00-15:00 PST instead ? Also what can't be discussed over email ? Thx, R. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:06 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> wrote: Dear all, The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to reach consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could review the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements. Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may help us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I’d suggest we arrange a 1-hour conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are located in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the 9:00 (UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day. Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks. https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the meeting. I’m not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I’d appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Jie -- Bgp-autoconf mailing list Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org<mailto:Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
- [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- [Bgp-autoconf] 回复: A conference call in next week… 徐小虎(义先)