Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 25 February 2020 23:13 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714D83A07D9;
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:13:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id qzbPMML5oBgM; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9FE3A07E0;
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net
(99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67])
by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B05B81E2D3;
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:19:24 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_BBE228F0-888C-470A-A1BF-1CBD5B47A97E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <19806d22-d8bd-4a4c-b034-4bce3e282e55.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:13:37 -0500
Cc: Bgp-autoconf <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>,
bgp autoconf <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <561C5596-99E1-4EDC-8079-8C300D67BB9F@pfrc.org>
References: <m2v9nvxsc6.wl-randy@psg.com>
<19806d22-d8bd-4a4c-b034-4bce3e282e55.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?IuW+kOWwj+iZjijkuYnlhYgpIg==?= <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/rXQCxleZkjTzJPn0O2TpjcqAHbg>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list
<bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:13:40 -0000
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 6:10 PM, 徐小虎(义先) <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > > I'm fine with those assumptions except item 2. I think we need some clarification. It's sure that we are not changing the current BGP mechanism. However, as for which protocol should be used for BGP peer autodiscovery, we should not exclude BGP on purpose. Let's not get over-wrought about what needs to change for what reason. Most of the details will likely come naturally from the functional requirements. -- Jeff
- [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions 徐小虎(义先)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions 徐小虎(义先)