IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2723A0123; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FsX9qW43b9X; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD643A03EC; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0A9E3E11577B2F8C9B2B; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:02:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:02:16 +0000
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:02:14 +0800
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.9.48.231]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:02:14 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
CC: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
Thread-Index: AdYD5BoY1/vsZUekSbS5o5dq12iRZw==
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:02:14 +0000
Message-ID: <0b815dc7cf3f4eaa99448893e2bcd72d@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.211]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_0b815dc7cf3f4eaa99448893e2bcd72dhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/shin7FnJceRnju9axe28jye5sn8>
Subject: [Bgp-autoconf] Initial slides for the progress report\\RE: Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:02:26 -0000

Hi all, 

Please find attached the slides I prepared for the design team progress report on the upcoming IDR interim. 

Let me know if you have any comment or suggestion about it. 

The plan is to upload it by end of this Saturday (EDT time). 

Best regards,
Jie

-----Original Message-----
From: Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy)
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 10:45 AM
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting

Hi Randy, 

Thanks for your confirmation. I'll put together all our discussion about this into the slides of the design team progress report.

Best regards,
Jie

-----Original Message-----
From: Bgp-autoconf [mailto:bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 9:15 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] Progress report of design team on IDR virtual meeting

jimmy,

> Thanks for your further clarification. Thus what you suggest is a 
> generic capability to communicate arbitrary attributes according to 
> the operators' need. Is my understanding correct?

yes.  i did point to how l3dl-ulpc does that.  [ not meant as an argument to adopt l3dl ]

> Do you think such information exchange should happen in the peer 
> autodiscovery/autoconf stage?

sure.  if and only if there are no predefined semantics, then it's just some bits on the wire that the op can leverage.

randy

--
Bgp-autoconf mailing list
Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

--
Bgp-autoconf mailing list
Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email