IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

" 徐小虎(义先) " <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B0E3A07FF; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:19:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXDs31TjPNu1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out0-157.mail.aliyun.com (out0-157.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E229D3A07F8; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:19:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1582672771; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=ffYxNkbje0SQlsZNDyn/KrPyUT2RQ68jJ4ciE7Icd7k=; b=Cr/9v0h5O/DZJpQvQKirWXEvW4Wcy76E11d7u5YNib1sTyqXV2MhwT2Poq+8RPlhLyP6B9oH9lYOYxV+nTzSa++UiM67Bvtd7a3C95BSTC07i8RpEf+docVM3Sl2SJTqJ3yI8CmyQDX1iCC1uAULnIeyO+wEG/CiwxgiAXMCWlg=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R361e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01l07447; MF=xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=4; SR=0; TI=W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_0A9323E5_1582672758161_o7001c2178;
Received: from WS-web (xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com[W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_0A9323E5_1582672758161_o7001c2178]) by e02c03300.eu6 at Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:19:30 +0800
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:19:30 +0800
From: "=?UTF-8?B?5b6Q5bCP6JmOKOS5ieWFiCk=?=" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
To: "Bgp-autoconf" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org>, "=?UTF-8?B?QWNlZSBMaW5kZW0gKGFjZWUp?=" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>, "bgp autoconf" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "=?UTF-8?B?5b6Q5bCP6JmOKOS5ieWFiCk=?=" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <0fbf1eab-88d1-4f80-a358-c5d2f8850d1a.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 59873560][W4_5790132][v5ForWebDing][Safari]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <73E23EF6-D901-4199-800E-49BFABD1FBC5@cisco.com>, <B1919BA6-CE7C-4949-AABE-C98D7C64367F@gmail.com>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_5790132_v5ForWebDing_NjATW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTJfNikgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNjA1LjEuMTUgKEtIVE1MLCBsaWtlIEdlY2tvKSBWZXJzaW9uLzEyLjAuMyBTYWZhcmkvNjA1LjEuMTU=XQ
In-Reply-To: <B1919BA6-CE7C-4949-AABE-C98D7C64367F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_57273_50343940_5e55ab82_2d83a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/vQS29KNBYui_pzSZXpcc6rsUcJU>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] =?utf-8?q?assumptions?=
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:19:36 -0000

Sound reasonable.

Best regards,
Xiaohu






------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Send Time:2020年2月26日(星期三) 06:45
To:Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc:Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>om>; bgp autoconf <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject:Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

Acee,

I disagree, there’s a difference between changing BGP semantics and adding lightweighted AD function on top.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Feb 25, 2020, at 04:21, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>  Hi Randy, 
> 
>  On 2/24/20, 10:24 PM, "Bgp-autoconf on behalf of Randy Bush" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>    some underlying assumptions:
> 
>      o with a datacenter, not inter-datacenter
> 
>      o we are not changing bgp
> 
> This would disqualify LDP-esque mechanisms being added to BGP and we'd have one less draft to consider __
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>      o we will not force major change on the operator's architecture
> 
>      o attempt to be minimal
> 
>    randy
> 
>    -- 
>    Bgp-autoconf mailing list
>    Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bgp-autoconf mailing list
> Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

-- 
Bgp-autoconf mailing list
Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email