IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F963A05AA for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Eo3QNnQv4uq for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4603A05A4 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id d9so280628pgu.3 for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gM/18ZA9Wvfk1M7mT6Zxs+PWY6tDdZLJ7ysRuB5y7U0=; b=HptCWUb9x4muTuz/Kc3AM93NmOl20snl8/VKoTXgfm/SvC/qw/ZbH44/JD3C9grCwg BigtOeAxS4TmeYXwKpfo5p2xFPFczaHJRDhL/W5QQYKn3QtkvTwTPsP3W/PnY1wOpsXt uwC8ZiorDo8QiejVeFsstQE/hxsgcA+/TtECSmbhRBc8+v0sEAVR+I3lnYDbZ8aCoanR XnadYYB/5V3FcByglsbXuCB+41xGt0jGTVjhXajuyEd8SD8lchoybZZv/K+TKFUnDC4L 1TpFLTYbx6yI5kpQIdFnHwe9VdL29D0VbNgCcAg6Wh/x0GPVEcMfj+Dz9wc2yY//YyJK Xjqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=gM/18ZA9Wvfk1M7mT6Zxs+PWY6tDdZLJ7ysRuB5y7U0=; b=i4Mfg/m7zeGO8Hn8KxxO1TWS+BckjqoUJ5FubBDLNKPGSEiG5WWHJGL0phzeZEXQWD bN0RnVzStPmIl9YO8viBZbKedmi6MnRZ7HHGzkz6fOIgC1ubjYyEFle7qTHkkxyvyB0Y /v46jADEUSQ6uGFol1CH9K5vHHXcwkKDg78sz1F6jTFtYtqPvr9/okdEfEmS4mq8CmCh GVf72HhdcCdBo+kcPQ0tkjFANU9PJ25YaKg6jZvL/gCE6cciMtQAEaDmI52Ux80bvjKx OGpSBsjPhBXh1plHLjCnScdLelj9bZDswg0+uy+h/UjCOYVHwldOpeitRny+4eqD+abM yylg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWURsKg1/J74fKhygU3TzVyR9QMgCorUnEKcopTbN8/2FNsTSgm O1/n8oBSnWy0WVwlLaWUUhtGUEdv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsGFXF0qRmTvO5cqGFWc+vYls403eq33v/2GzruP8ihIU+ZcwtYapMzl1kJTnrUayne4HMfA==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8815:: with SMTP id c21mr964084pfo.81.1582670742933; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:4e32:100c:712c:3cb3:c791:a3c0? ([2607:fb90:4e32:100c:712c:3cb3:c791:a3c0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a35sm57515pgl.20.2020.02.25.14.45.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:45:40 -0800
Message-Id: <B1919BA6-CE7C-4949-AABE-C98D7C64367F@gmail.com>
References: <73E23EF6-D901-4199-800E-49BFABD1FBC5@cisco.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, bgp autoconf <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <73E23EF6-D901-4199-800E-49BFABD1FBC5@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/xlIp8Xfmp9Km1L5ntoSCejzhnD4>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] assumptions
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list <bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>, <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:45:45 -0000

Acee,

I disagree, there’s a difference between changing BGP semantics and adding lightweighted AD function on top.

Regards,
Jeff

> On Feb 25, 2020, at 04:21, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Randy, 
> 
> On 2/24/20, 10:24 PM, "Bgp-autoconf on behalf of Randy Bush" <bgp-autoconf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>    some underlying assumptions:
> 
>      o with a datacenter, not inter-datacenter
> 
>      o we are not changing bgp
> 
> This would disqualify LDP-esque mechanisms being added to BGP and we'd have one less draft to consider __
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>      o we will not force major change on the operator's architecture
> 
>      o attempt to be minimal
> 
>    randy
> 
>    -- 
>    Bgp-autoconf mailing list
>    Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bgp-autoconf mailing list
> Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email