Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP autoconf requirements?
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 21 February 2020 22:21 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377061200C1
for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:21:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id KKsnyq3r_AWW for <bgp-autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1628F12008F
for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id r137so3167225oie.5
for <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:21:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=lXYQJDzu+Lcsq7xxnj9G3YiLHfJG7N0ZMkmGWk++Vqk=;
b=Nhrt+RFDTti/5lMFt9K/AnoMzXn/x2yZecyuxpF3IOy/alzbC9BD27W0lXEiBe9t72
w+5AMgIcDTi0YXWs9d0GoTWPq3IjUhQsC+XnUIca7Cfr2rhqpK/yTRsKA+qaSwzaUZVf
JYj7jDV6U4D7/YmyUEvkfCeVtWimXW4nuLskbFtfBuJ18rb5paKAvwvobRhJyrRLMXGN
mUFBgj/pr+QyHG/Mbg371VU6sNnO5mf160h8KB6dFiFRDks8clCNcSNqti5ytTPOV771
R7Bz4tWKb6/oUpg+MiH0fM1fXkL6Hw3r2Tu5LS+6dyyF1FessAXC1HGItneu1IJikmGF
aY0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=lXYQJDzu+Lcsq7xxnj9G3YiLHfJG7N0ZMkmGWk++Vqk=;
b=nMxt+wIiDkn6n8CnHkGgWkadSa1qIoENtEn1Q1u375TNaIcQrc4le3Mm6wh+IJYdeL
EEgfqAcshfWvf3u01Vv0ik3+HYHcRT8Zg1YILeT5qGiBqtOuAB0P0LjU6KzJRKYLXNhF
67uEMdswLlZGN1H0xjimmtsqqtKfsh4pUJ5luEpqyEsZdwDj7jAOod7PJTUrnaIb51Pr
MokyXZtVbZcblgMqkFKMrHQVjDkfk2XekxCrv5ieuJWfGmnd16Xj2e6LgxzVm/wLVjzr
xEFkWmMiFPOA23lwLnwq9HIYRx4FAPMEKsGUMM3zSYyS7SCOks941POs73D/mKpnwcSo
oJkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXPdxPvnDA7+D4G0PWcjjD1BhzD003RPxv6FNv/6jSHqoof5KK+
LdwpbCmw348RyxuInbXWFpWJilWTWM4y5banyw6HKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrBWUamzZ1DU0JbggwQS1/A06KeHGffWe+yWrAXwIcTrQGzWH6AlOPoIdIn8d1gB6wYaSQQDPVQSkvZIul2mI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c7ca:: with SMTP id x193mr3910035oif.70.1582323672352;
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:21:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <70e313e9faec408b85c6b29cff0be23f@huawei.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 23:21:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMG2wLNf-1sD+RbTCxocFsPViASr47vy-6TZCeFOhjTSmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: "bgp-autoconf@ietf.org" <bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>,
"idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006919cd059f1d704d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bgp-autoconf/ziEcw6mdTbCudWdzxDzSIHD1ECE>
Subject: Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to discuss BGP
autoconf requirements?
X-BeenThere: bgp-autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP autoconfiguration design team discussion list
<bgp-autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bgp-autoconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bgp-autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf>,
<mailto:bgp-autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:21:17 -0000
May we have it 8:00-15:00 PST instead ? Also what can't be discussed over email ? Thx, R. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:06 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > The IETF 107 meeting is approaching, we need to make more progress to > reach consensus on the requirements (for the DC case first), then we could > review the candidate solutions about how they match the requirements. > > > > Based on the current mail list activity, it seems a conference call may > help us to have more efficient discussion. Thus I’d suggest we arrange a > 1-hour conference call in next week. I assume many of our team members are > located in (UTC+8) and (UTC-8), thus a possible meeting time could be the > 9:00 (UTC+8), which is 17:00 (UTC-8) in the previous day. > > > > Here is the doodle poll for the meeting time, I also added other potential > time slots, please respond to it by end of this weekend, thanks. > > > > https://doodle.com/poll/6de9ei4iuubxs9ya > > > > Once the meeting time is determined, we also need some help to setup the > meeting. I’m not sure whether we could use the WGs Webex account for the > design team conference call, will check with the chairs. If not, I’d > appreciate if someone could help with this. Thanks in advance. > > > > Best regards, > > Jie > -- > Bgp-autoconf mailing list > Bgp-autoconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bgp-autoconf >
- [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week to … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Susan Hares
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Bgp-autoconf] A conference call in next week… Randy Bush
- [Bgp-autoconf] 回复: A conference call in next week… 徐小虎(义先)