BGP-4 MIB to Draft Standard

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Thu, 16 November 1995 13:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10237; 16 Nov 95 8:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10233; 16 Nov 95 8:52 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08419; 16 Nov 95 8:52 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA19987 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Thu, 16 Nov 1995 08:32:59 -0500
Message-Id: <199511161332.AA19987@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Thu, 16 Nov 1995 08:32:59 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Thu, 16 Nov 1995 08:32:59 -0500
To: bgp@ans.net
Subject: BGP-4 MIB to Draft Standard
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 95 05:32:56 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>

Folks,

The revised Internet Draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib-00.txt) reflects
the comment from Paul Traina on BGP-4 MIB.

In order to advance BGP-4 to a Full Standard we first need to make
BGP-4 MIB into a Draft Standard. So, I'd like to see if anyone in the
WG would object advancing BGP-4 MIB to a Draft Standard.  To make
timely progress I'd like to set up Nov 23 as a deadline for comments.
If I wouldn't hear any objections by Nov 23, on Nov 24 I plan to send a
note to the IESG asking the IESG to advance BGP-4 MIB to a Draft
Standard.

Yakov.