IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Wanted: one more well-known BGP community

Vince Fuller <vaf@valinor.barrnet.net> Wed, 09 August 1995 22:45 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21360; 9 Aug 95 18:45 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21356; 9 Aug 95 18:45 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21620; 9 Aug 95 18:45 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA63945 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:32:38 -0400
Message-Id: <199508092232.AA63945@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:32:38 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:32:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 15:33:26 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Vince Fuller <vaf@valinor.barrnet.net>
To: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Phone: (415) 528-7227
Usmail: 3801 East Bayshore Rd, Palo Alto, CA, 94303
Subject: Re: Wanted: one more well-known BGP community
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 09 Aug 1995 15:26:04 -0700

    Yes, this is an inappropriate forum for discussing feature requests with
    cisco.  Please use cs-iprouting-bgp@cisco.com unless you're talking about
    a standardized IETF protocol, which communities are not.

Sorry, I thought communities were a standard, defined BGP attribute and certain
of them, notably "no-advertise" and "no-export" were well-known. If this is
not the case, then it is certainly not appropriate to discuss this on the BGP
mailing list so I will take it private.

	--Vince

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email