Question on CIDR
Radha Gowda <rxg@proteon.com> Wed, 25 October 1995 22:03 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20310;
25 Oct 95 18:03 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20306;
25 Oct 95 18:03 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20184;
25 Oct 95 18:03 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA01308
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:45:14 -0400
Message-Id: <199510252145.AA01308@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:45:14 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:45:14 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Radha Gowda <rxg@proteon.com>
Subject: Question on CIDR
To: bgp@ans.net
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 246
Are the ISPs allowed to allocate a range of addresses within a network
to different ASs? Rather, is the following configuration valid in real
networks? Thanks!
AS1 AS2 AS3
10.2.0.0/16 <------> 20.0.0.0/8 <------> 10.3.0.0/16
- Question on CIDR Radha Gowda
- Re: Question on CIDR Tony Li
- Re: Question on CIDR Paul Traina