Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard
Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@pobox.wellfleet.com> Fri, 03 February 1995 18:27 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07036;
3 Feb 95 13:27 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07032;
3 Feb 95 13:27 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16120;
3 Feb 95 13:27 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA36242
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:16:38 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-3);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:16:38 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:16:38 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:16:38 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 13:19:53 EST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@pobox.wellfleet.com>
Message-Id: <9502031819.AA23623@pobox.wellfleet>
To: bgp@ans.net, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard
Yakov, So far my request to modify the current MIB have not got any support. I'm assuming there is a rough consensus to promote the current MIB as is to a Draft Standard. I also don't have any reason to believe that the consensus will change at next WG meeting. Dimitry
- BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard yakov
- Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard Paul Traina
- Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard Dimitry Haskin