Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard
Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> Fri, 03 February 1995 18:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06593;
3 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06589;
3 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15749;
3 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA19961
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:02:18 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:02:18 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1);
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 13:02:18 -0500
Message-Id: <199502031802.KAA11702@feta.cisco.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: feta.cisco.com: Host localhost.cisco.com didn't use
HELO protocol
To: yakov@watson.ibm.com
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 Feb 1995 12:49:45 EST."
<199502031749.AA19726@interlock.ans.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 1995 10:02:11 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
My opinion has not changed, I think having to deprecate the peer table at this late point and starting over is a very bad idea given the epsilon gain this change makes.
- BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard yakov
- Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard Paul Traina
- Re: BGP 4 MIB to a Draft Standard Dimitry Haskin