Re: 7/18/95 Wg Meeting notes (IETF)

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Wed, 19 July 1995 21:10 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14598; 19 Jul 95 17:10 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14594; 19 Jul 95 17:10 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18587; 19 Jul 95 17:10 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA08729 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 16:51:42 -0400
Message-Id: <199507192051.AA08729@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 16:51:42 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 16:51:42 -0400
To: skh@merit.edu
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: 7/18/95 Wg Meeting notes (IETF)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jul 1995 05:41:03 EDT." <199507190941.AA36273@interlock.ans.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 16:50:23 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>

In message <199507190941.AA36273@interlock.ans.net>et>, skh@merit.edu writes:
> 
> 5) Route Damping protocol
> 
> Curtis Villamizar wrote up a Route Damping protocol two years
> ago.  The Internet Draft received little review during the last time.
> Comments from the audience indicate that this was due to the 
> intense focus on getting "the network" to work during the 
> last year or so.  Now, the route flapping is causing problems and
> the group wants to re-examine this document.
> 
> Bill Manning volunteered Ramesh Govindan to talk to Curtis,
> and get the Route Damping Document written up by the RA's.
> The RA route server has implemented this function.  


Sue,

Nice of you to record Bill's willingness to contact me.  :-) You are
on the Cc below.  Did you fail to receive this and the replies from
Ravi and Yakov that you were Cc'd on?  Ramesh dropped the Cc in his
reply.  Someone at the meeting should have known we were already
working on this.  :-)  (no problem)  :-)

In any case, I just this morning sent an updated copy to the other
authors.  I need to go through it again and Ravi and Ramesh have
agreed to provide implementation experience.  I also need to make a
lot of equations compatible with a text version.  I think Ravi said
there was either an error or something he did differently from the
original and the NANOG notes, but I haven't received details.

It is still slightly early to post to the list.  I'll send a URL
shortly for anyone that wants to preview before a fraft is submitted.

Curtis


Message-Id: <199506301839.OAA01270@laplink-lt.brookfield.ans.net>
To: Ravi Chandra <rchandra@cisco.com>om>, Ramesh Govindan
<govindan@isi.edu>
Cc: curtis@ans.net, tli@cisco.com, pst@cisco.com, yakov@cisco.com,
        skh@merit.edu
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Route Flap Dampen draft
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 14:39:44 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>


Ravi, Ramesh,

I think you two are the the ones implementing the route flap
dampenning idea at Cisco and ISI.  I'd like to update the October 93
non-draft and want to know if you are would like to contribute as
co-authors or if not review the updated draft (when it gets updated).

Is there anyone else at Cisco or ISI that might want to contribute to
this?  Would it be appropriate to advance this as an Informational RFC
through the IDR WG?

Curtis