how well will IDRP nee BGP work?

bmanning@isi.edu Mon, 21 August 1995 17:34 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13077; 21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13073; 21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15311; 21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA18071 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Message-Id: <199508211720.AA18071@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-3); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Subject: how well will IDRP nee BGP work?
To: bgp@ans.net
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1180

From the IPv6 mailing list.  Concerned with the general prospect of
renumbering in IPv6 and perhaps IPv4, I raised this question... and
was refered here.  When/If renumbering is the defacto mode of operation,
and if my assumptions are correct, then BGP/IDRP are fundamentally flawed.

Please tell me that this is not so and BGP/IDRP will be happy with
dynamic renumbering. (Can figure out who its peers are w/o manual
intervention)


>> 3) For Inter-domain routing, the plan is to use IDRP.  There is an ID on
>>     IDRP for IPv6.
>>     To date, there are two independent implementations of IDRP.
>>     One was done by IBM, and one by MERIT.  Both are reported to be part
>>     of gated.  I am re-checking this as it does not appear in my copy.
>>     There is reported to be a earuopean vendor who has a version as well.
>> 
>
>Thanks for the update.   I do have a minor problem, perhaps conceptual.
>My understanding is that IDRP shares that same characterisics as BGP.
>And as we all know, BGP is effectivly a point2point protocol.  What
>affect will this protocol feature have given the  general concept of 
>dynamic renumbering and address configuration in IPv6?

--bill