how well will IDRP nee BGP work?
bmanning@isi.edu Mon, 21 August 1995 17:34 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13077;
21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13073;
21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15311;
21 Aug 95 13:34 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA18071
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Message-Id: <199508211720.AA18071@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-3);
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Posted-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:20:04 -0400
Subject: how well will IDRP nee BGP work?
To: bgp@ans.net
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1180
From the IPv6 mailing list. Concerned with the general prospect of renumbering in IPv6 and perhaps IPv4, I raised this question... and was refered here. When/If renumbering is the defacto mode of operation, and if my assumptions are correct, then BGP/IDRP are fundamentally flawed. Please tell me that this is not so and BGP/IDRP will be happy with dynamic renumbering. (Can figure out who its peers are w/o manual intervention) >> 3) For Inter-domain routing, the plan is to use IDRP. There is an ID on >> IDRP for IPv6. >> To date, there are two independent implementations of IDRP. >> One was done by IBM, and one by MERIT. Both are reported to be part >> of gated. I am re-checking this as it does not appear in my copy. >> There is reported to be a earuopean vendor who has a version as well. >> > >Thanks for the update. I do have a minor problem, perhaps conceptual. >My understanding is that IDRP shares that same characterisics as BGP. >And as we all know, BGP is effectivly a point2point protocol. What >affect will this protocol feature have given the general concept of >dynamic renumbering and address configuration in IPv6? --bill
- how well will IDRP nee BGP work? bmanning
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Dimitry Haskin
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? bmanning
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Susan Hares
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Curtis Villamizar
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Tony Li
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Scott Bradner
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Tony Li
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Curtis Villamizar
- Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work? Bill Manning