IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work?

Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@baynetworks.com> Mon, 21 August 1995 18:07 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13608; 21 Aug 95 14:07 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13604; 21 Aug 95 14:07 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16012; 21 Aug 95 14:07 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA23003 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:56:32 -0400
Message-Id: <199508211756.AA23003@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-3); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:56:32 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:56:32 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:56:32 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 95 13:56:27 EDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@baynetworks.com>
To: bmanning@isi.edu
Subject: Re: how well will IDRP nee BGP work?
Cc: bgp@ans.net

> From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
> Posted-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: how well will IDRP nee BGP work?
> 
> >From the IPv6 mailing list.  Concerned with the general prospect of
> renumbering in IPv6 and perhaps IPv4, I raised this question... and
> was refered here.  When/If renumbering is the defacto mode of operation,
> and if my assumptions are correct, then BGP/IDRP are fundamentally flawed.
> 
> Please tell me that this is not so and BGP/IDRP will be happy with
> dynamic renumbering. (Can figure out who its peers are w/o manual
> intervention)
> 
>

Bill,

I believe that major pain of renumbering is with hosts nor routers. Hence,
I guess, some manual re-configuration of routers is acceptable and
probably unavoidable.  Do you think otherwise?

Dimitry

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email