re: apology for the e-mail barrage
Anthony D'Atri <aad@nwnet.net> Thu, 09 May 1996 17:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19903;
9 May 96 13:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19899;
9 May 96 13:46 EDT
Received: from p-o.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12076; 9 May 96 13:46 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by p-o.ans.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA29408
for bgp-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 17:35:18 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: p-o.ans.net: majordom set sender to bgp-owner using
-f
Message-Id: <olYWmnr0I0or0xh1I0@nwnet.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 10:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Anthony D'Atri <aad@nwnet.net>
To: bgp@ans.net, Gregory Mirsky <gmirsky@baynetworks.com>,
Peter Lothberg <roll@stupi.se>, Mark Knopper <mak@ieng.com>,
Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Reitzel <areitzel@gateway.mitre.org>,
Christina Chu <cyc@nwnet.net>, Linda Wright <lwright@cac.washington.edu>,
NorthWestNet System Engineering <se@nwnet.net>
Subject: re: apology for the e-mail barrage
X-Orig-Sender: bgp-owner@ans.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bgp@ans.net
Our ex-employee bouncer takes great pains to figure out the correct address to which to respond and to determine when that address isn't a single human and thus shouldn't be responded to at all, but had a glitch where even when it decided to not respond to a message, it would anyway 8^(. I've since fixed this bug and tested that it works as intended. My apologies for the inconvenience.
- re: apology for the e-mail barrage Anthony D'Atri
- Re: apology for the e-mail barrage Guy T Almes