Re: Question

Enke Chen <enke@mci.net> Wed, 06 March 1996 15:55 UTC

Message-Id: <199603061514.KAA24077@postoffice.reston.mci.net>
To: jung@jean.kotel.co.kr
Cc: bgp@ans.net, enke@mci.net, vancamp@nsipo.nasa.gov, angelo@nsipo.nasa.gov, netconfig@krunk.arc.nasa.gov, nevin@ans.net, gerald@merit.edu, jjohnson@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Question
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Mar 1996 13:49:06 +0900." <199603060449.NAA03762@jean.kotel.co.kr>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 10:14:29 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Enke Chen <enke@mci.net>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bgp@ans.net

Hi, Hwang: 
I do no think that these questions are appropriate for the 
BGP mailing list. Please allow me to make two suggestions: 

(1) Work with your provider to resolve operational problems. 
(2) If you are multi-homed to more than one provider, BGP
    is the protocol to use. 

-- Enke

> Date:    Wed, 6 Mar 1996 13:49:06 +0900
> From:    Hwang Hyojung <jung@jean.kotel.co.kr>
> To:      enke@mci.net
> CC:      bgp@ans.net, vancamp@nsipo.nasa.gov, angelo@nsipo.nasa.gov,
	   netconfig@krunk.arc.nasa.gov, nevin@ans.net, gerald@merit.edu,
	   jjohnson@cisco.com, enke@mci.net

> 
> Thanks. That makes me know one more about RADB.
> 
> Then, 
> 
> Network X can receive routing information of one area of AS200 and one 
> area of AS100. 
>  
> With default routing to AS200, it can reach only one area of AS100 of which 
> routing information is received. 
> Even other sites in AS100 except that one area of AS100, it can reach through
 
> AS200. Is it right ? 
> 
> If it is right, it is very ineffiecient, isn't it ? 
> Any other method ? 
> 
> -- Jung

Question Hwang Hyojung
Re: Question Enke Chen
Re: Question Hwang Hyojung
Re: Question Enke Chen